The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3259 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Yes. We have not taken any evidence on that so far, so I would like to get your view on the public record.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
You said in your written submission that it appears “somewhat heavy-handed”, and Eric Brown and Isobel d’Invervo say much the same in their submissions in that regard. We will take evidence from Revenue Scotland subsequently, but my understanding is that collection rates for those other taxes are around 98 or 99 per cent, so I understand what you mean. Can Eric and Isobel comment on that part of the bill?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Eric, you said:
“We would ... suggest further controls ... are placed upon the system of credits with interactions between”
Scottish aggregates tax and UK aggregates levy
“to reduce the likelihood of potential abuses taking place.”
Will you tell us more about that?
09:45Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
That is why we are talking about a possible loss to the Scottish taxpayer of £8 million to £10 million.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
We have exhausted questions from members—
I am sorry. John Mason has a question, which I had a note of.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Anecdotally, it seems to me to be a bigger issue than the cross-border issue. We visited a secondary processor of recycled aggregates in Livingston, and the people there said that, because of the cost of transport, they would not even sell to Edinburgh, because it is too far away from the point of view of the money that they would make. Given that the land on both sides of the border is fairly depopulated and there is not much use of aggregates there, it would cost so much to export there that the cross-border issue is a bit of a myth. It would be an issue only if aggregates were being shipped from big quarries, such as Glensanda, which was referred to in the previous session.
How much of an issue is the cross-border issue? In section 4.15 of your submission, you said:
“We are working with stakeholders, the Bill team and HMRC, to identify the different types of cross border arrangements in order to establish the most effective and efficient way to administer the tax in those situations.”
What are those effective and efficient ways to administer the tax, following your deliberations?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I mean the impact of tax changes in Scotland relative to the rest of the UK on our revenue streams.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I just wanted to clarify those numbers.
My last question also concerns the clarification of numbers. The example in table 3 of the financial memorandum gives a summary of estimated Revenue Scotland running costs for the first year of the SAT. The numbers are all rounded. For example, amortisation—which is a great word that means
“the spreading of the cost of an intangible asset such as an IT system”—
is £200,000, operational staff costs are £645,000 and operational non-staff costs are £60,000. Once that is all done and dusted, the costs would be about £905,000 a year.
What are the parameters for that? How accurate are those figures? Are they within 5 per cent, 10 per cent or 20 per cent limits? How confident are you that the figures in the financial memorandum for the set-up costs and, importantly, the continuing operational costs are accurate?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
From my perspective, “comfortable” isnae very numeric. That is why I asked whether the confidence limit is 5 per cent, 10 per cent or 20 per cent. What kind of ball park are we talking about? Obviously, financial memorandums have to be best estimates, but how confident are you?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2024
Kenneth Gibson
That figure will have been set on the basis of today’s prices, obviously.