The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3259 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
What about you, Brian?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I know—exactly.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much, that has concluded the questions from the committee. Thank you very much for the evidence that you have given this morning. We will continue with our next panel of witnesses and beyond. I will call a break until 5 to 11.
10:47 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Welcome back, folks. We will continue taking evidence for our inquiry into Scotland’s commissioner landscape. I welcome Nicola Killean, Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland; Dr Claire Methven O’Brien, commissioner, and Jan Savage, executive director, from the Scottish Human Rights Commission; and Rosemary Agnew, Scottish Public Services Ombudsman. I intend to allow about 90 minutes for this session.
I will begin by asking about duplication, because in your submissions—they are excellent and are of a very high standard—the issue of duplication runs throughout. It is important to start with an issue that you have all highlighted. I will go to Nicola Killean first; others can respond subsequently. Your submission said:
“We have a statutory duty to avoid duplicating the work of others as far as is practical. We already have overlapping remits with other Commissioners and Commissions and other statutory bodies such as regulators, inspectorates and ombudsmen. We strongly recommend that parliament makes it a key priority to ensure that any new offices do not further limit the remit of existing offices or create more complexity for children and young people.”
Will you talk us through that a wee bit? Where do you feel that there is duplication with other organisations? Which organisations are they?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Do you have concerns about particular bodies?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
The same argument could be made for a parliamentary term. In five years do we rush to achieve things within a short time? Every member around this table faces a sunset clause every five years and some of us face it more frequently than that, in a different form.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
That is very interesting. Thank you for that.
Okay, folks—that concludes this evidence session. I thank everyone for their evidence. We will continue our deliberations next week. I call a brief break until 12.20, so that our guests and the public can leave before we go into private session.
12:17 Meeting continued in private until 12:33.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
In your opening statement, you talked about the importance of improving outcomes. In its submission, Alzheimer Scotland said:
“The financial cost of this changing landscape must be considered against improved outcomes”.
Through your research, have you identified whether commissioners have been able to deliver improved outcomes for those for whom they are advocating? If so, can you give an example or two?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
I was not originally intending to ask that question but, because you mentioned outcomes in your opening statement, I thought that I would throw it out there. Ultimately, improving outcomes is what commissioners are trying to do. The whole purpose of them is to look at outcomes, and there is a concern about the lack of overall research, so it is important that we ascertain whether commissioners are delivering better outcomes than would be the case if they did not exist and whether there are other ways in which organisations and individuals could be assisted.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 16 April 2024
Kenneth Gibson
Another area that you touched on in your opening statement was duplication. You say in your report that
“One interviewee highlighted that the focus on creating more bodies to promote and support human rights did not support the findings of the Crerar Review in 2007, which reviewed regulation, audit, inspection and complaints handling of public services in Scotland. It found that scrutiny arrangement in Scotland were complex, and aimed to simplify and reduce bodies.”
The Deputy First Minister contacted us about that particular issue with regard to the strategic approach to the commissioner landscape and said:
“As agreed by Cabinet on 9 May 2023, the Scottish Government’s Ministerial Control Framework (MCF) aims to ensure that decisions around the creation of new public bodies are made based on evidence and value for money”.
The first of the three principles that she touches on is that new public bodies
“should only be set up as a last resort”.
That is completely different, incidentally, from what The Times reported today. It talks about the Scottish Government wanting to double the number of commissioners. I was certainly not aware that it was trying to do that. In the context of your research, how do you view the issue of the number of bodies and how duplication can be avoided?