The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
At last week’s meeting, we heard from Sarah Watters from COSLA, who said:
“Not only is demand for services increasing because of all the crises that are out there—in social care, business support and all sorts of areas that local government touches—but the cost of providing services is huge because of inflationary pressures.”—[Official Report, COVID-19 Recovery Committee, 22 September 2022; c 2.]
Mairi Spowage referred—before it happened, obviously—to the “United Kingdom fiscal event” on 23 September, saying:
“There will be huge implications for the Scottish budget if the UK Government decides to fundamentally change taxes in England”,
which, as we know, is what happened. She went on to say:
“That could mean ... a boost ... to the Scottish budget envelope”,
but
“We do not know how much detail we are going to get about spending plans, which could obviously have consequentials. There is not only huge pressure, but huge uncertainty ... I worry about whether we will have enough detail to give more certainty to the Scottish Government and local government.”—[Official Report, COVID-19 Recovery Committee, 22 September 2022; c 6.]
The Chief Secretary to the Treasury, to whom I listened this morning, did not provide any more clarity, other than to say that spending decisions will be tight, regardless of the budget envelope that comes to the Scottish Government.
Could you expand on that issue, to help us to understand it?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
Last week, we also heard from Dr Lukas Hardt, who is the policy and engagement lead at the Wellbeing Economy Alliance Scotland. He stressed the importance of the Scottish Government’s using existing devolved tax powers to support provision of further services, and said that it might struggle to address inequalities
“within the funding envelope that it has set out”.
He also said:
“I am a bit surprised that such limitations on funding are so readily accepted, given the powers of the Scottish Government—for example, its devolved power over local taxes. There are possibilities for thinking outside the box ... and ... challenging the idea, ‘This is the money we have’.”—[Official Report, COVID-19 Recovery Committee, 22 September 2022; c 5.]
Are there areas in which you are not thinking outside the box?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
Do you mean that the UK Government might need to reverse it?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
When you say that that tax position will not hold, can you explain what you mean?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
Dr Hardt also said that council tax reform
“is long overdue, because the current system is regressive. We know that the Scottish Government has powers over income tax bands, but it has not made a lot of use of them.”
I am not quite sure what he meant by that, but perhaps you might. Dr Hardt went on to say that
“Even if there might be good reasons for such an approach not being considered in more detail,”
he was surprised that more information on raising finances was not there, given that
“It is a five-year spending review”.—[Official Report, COVID-19 Recovery Committee, 22 September 2022; c 25.]
Is that a criticism that you accept?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
What kind of body would the centre for pandemic preparedness be? Would it be, say, a statutory body or a non-departmental public body? How do you envisage it?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
I am fine. I do not have a question.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
I want to go back to Diarmaid Lawlor on his point about getting projects ready. The previous panel mentioned the problem of getting contractors on an island who can do the work. If contractors are not available on an island, the project cannot move forward and therefore does not get funding. Therefore, contractors will not go to an island because the funding is not there for them to do the work. I fully support the idea of a competitive tendering process, but is there not a danger of creating a catch-22 situation by doing it in that way?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
I ask this question merely out of curiosity. If we had an allocation system instead of a competitive system, would that not just mean that the money would be spread across everything? People would say, “I could do a bit of this and a bit of that,” but the targets that the Government’s infrastructure proposals are looking to achieve would be missed.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jim Fairlie
If you have created that pipeline, which will be there for the future, I assume that it will require multiyear funding, which you can then guarantee. Has that created its own problems for you?