- Asked by: Davy Russell, MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 13 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 26 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work with football organisations, what
discussions it has had with the Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL) on
the reported proposed move by Hamilton Academical FC.
Answer
We speak to the SPFL regularly on a range of issues, and they have kept us updated on matters relating to Hamilton Academical FC and their proposed move.
I have recently written to the owners of the club offering to meet with them.
- Asked by: Martin Whitfield, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work to further the case for Scottish independence, what economic modelling it has undertaken of the potential impact on Scotland’s GDP growth of introducing a hard border with the rest of the UK.
Answer
With Independence, Scotland, like all independent countries, would control its borders. Details of how this would impact on movement of people and trade were published in Building a New Scotland: A stronger economy with independence (October 2022).
There is a long-standing Common Travel Area (CTA) in these islands. This allows for free movement between the UK, Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man for citizens of those territories. The Scottish Government is committed to the protection of the CTA and the associated reciprocal rights for British, Irish and Scottish citizens after independence. Maintenance of the CTA would mean that there would be no new passport or immigration checks at any of an independent Scotland’s land, sea or air border points with the UK and Ireland and British, Irish and Scottish citizens would have the right to move freely within the CTA.
It should also be noted that the nature of the border between an independent Scotland as an EU member state and the UK will depend on negotiations between the UK Government and the EU. For example, the UK and EU are currently negotiating an SPS Agreement which would reduce border checks.
Building a new Scotland: Independence in the modern world. Wealthier, happier, fairer: why not Scotland (June 22) looks at the potential impact of Independence on GDP. The paper sets out that comparable European independent countries to Scotland have higher national income per head than the UK. Across the ten comparator countries GDP per person in 2021 was on average £14,000 higher than in Scotland. The case of Ireland is used as an illustration which shows greater trade diversity coincided with substantial growth in the Irish economy.
It should further be noted that the Office For Budget Responsibility estimates Brexit will reduce UK GDP by 4 per cent in the long-run compared with continuing EU membership.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason Improving Public Access grants, which were suspended in 2022, are reportedly not going to be included in the Tier 3 rural payments scheme.
Answer
While Improving Public Access (IPA) is not currently included in Agri-Environment Climate Scheme (AECS) or Tier 3 of the Agricultural Reform Programme (ARP), the historical impact of the scheme is acknowledged, with over £12 million committed to 181 contracts between 2015 and 2022. No final decision has yet been taken regarding the future of IPA grants or their inclusion within the new Tier 3 of ARP. The design of the future rural support framework is still ongoing, and while the focus of Tier 3 will be on delivering the outcomes set out in the Vision for Agriculture, this does not preclude consideration of how access improvements might be supported through alternative mechanisms.
- Asked by: Martin Whitfield, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work to further the case for Scottish independence, what assessment it has made of any potential disruption to Scottish public procurement contracts held by suppliers based in England under any border regime in an independent Scotland.
Answer
Scottish public procurement contracts are already delivered by Scottish and international businesses.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 17 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-37224 by Ivan McKee on 13 May 2025, what the average desk occupancy was for each of its offices from January to December 2024.
Answer
The Scottish Government can only provide data on those buildings where its own data systems are in place. Some locations have landlord data systems in place and the Scottish Government does not have access to that data.
Average occupancy levels are shown in the following table for the buildings where we hold this data, these are taken as an average of attendance levels for a full day every second Tuesday for January - December 2024. Bothwell House closed for use by SG core staff in April 2025.
Building | Average occupancy for Jan - Dec 2024 |
Aberdeen University | 48.96% |
Atlantic Quay 5 (Glasgow) | 48.25% |
Bute House (Edinburgh) | 63.71% |
Bothwell House (Hamilton) | 6.25% |
Cadzow Court (Hamilton) | 51.30% |
Compass House (Dundee) | 61.73% |
Denholm House (Livingston) | 27.82% |
Alexander Fleming House (Elgin) | 26.09% |
Hadrian House (Falkirk) | 36.56% |
Tankerness Lane (Kirkwall) | 55.13% |
Longman House (Inverness) | 5.57% |
Marine Scotland (Aberdeen) | 29.50% |
Marine Scotland (Eyemouth) | 62.50% |
Marine Scotland (Peterhead) | 26.25% |
St Andrews House (Edinburgh) | 38.95% |
Saughton House (Edinburgh) | 21.42% |
Scotland House (Brussels) | 55.72% |
Scotland House (London) | 36.17% |
Strathearn House (Perth) | 29.05% |
Thainstone Court (Inverurie) | 11.90% |
Thurso (RPID) | 92.31% |
Tweedbank (RPID) | 14.34% |
Victoria Quay (Edinburgh) | 22.54% |
Total | 28.67% |
- Asked by: Martin Whitfield, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work to further the case for Scottish independence, whether it will commit to publishing a full impact assessment of the potential (a) economic and (b) social implications of any hard border between an independent Scotland and the rest of the UK, in advance of any future independence referendum being held.
Answer
The Scottish Government is committed to providing people with what independence would mean for them. As a result, we have now published thirteen papers in Building a new Scotland series, with a final overview paper to follow in due course.
For additional information I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-37999 on 25 June. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Martin Whitfield, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work to further the case for Scottish independence, what assessment it has made of what the total cost would be of (a) building and (b) operating any new customs infrastructure at the border with England in the first year of an independent Scotland.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-38009 on 25 June 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Martin Whitfield, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work to further the case for Scottish independence, what assessment it has made of what potential reduction in trade volumes for the (a) whisky, (b) meat and (c) dairy sector could result from any introduction of a hard border between an independent Scotland and the rest of the UK.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-38005 on 25 June 2025. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Martin Whitfield, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work to further the case for Scottish independence, what recent estimate it has made of the potential reduction in Scotland’s trade volume with the rest of the UK in the event of customs checks at the border in an independent Scotland.
Answer
Building a New Scotland: A stronger economy with independence (October 2022) provides details on trade with the rest of the UK following Independence.
The nature of the border between an independent Scotland as an EU member state and the UK will depend on negotiations between the UK Government and the EU. For example, the UK and EU are currently negotiating an SPS Agreement which would reduce border checks.
Ultimately trade with the rest of the UK would be based on the trade arrangements agreed between the EU and the UK at the time. Agreements between the EU and UK are subject to change and we welcome the renewed momentum to improve relations with the EU which may further reduce in the barriers to trade.
- Asked by: Martin Whitfield, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus Robertson on 25 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, as part of its work to further the case for Scottish independence, what assessment it has made of the potential administrative burden that could be placed on small Scottish exporters in the event that cross-border trade between an independent Scotland and the rest of the UK required customs declarations.
Answer
Scottish Government Officials and Ministers regularly engage with Scottish business representatives to inform policy. Engagement with businesses in Scotland informed the production of the BANS series, including Building a New Scotland: A stronger economy with independence (October 2022) which details how businesses will be supported on trade.
The proposals in the paper include support services and guidance to help traders understand and comply with any new arrangements. Working with industry to identify the right focus areas, the Scottish Government would seek to bring forward a range of measures – targeted across sectors and developed in response to trading conditions on the ground. Advice and guidance would be made available to businesses, such as through websites, helplines, and government-backed stakeholder support sessions.
The Scottish Government would also establish a support service for exporters to maximise Scotland’s export growth opportunities through our new trading arrangements. We also commit to supporting businesses with administrative requirements. We know that Scottish businesses have considerable expertise in trading internationally and would be best placed to determine which support measures are the most helpful. On re-joining the EU, we would work with business to provide the right practical help as new arrangements come into force.