- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 July 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 29 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the comments on page 2 of the 2016 SNP manifesto, what NHS board services and functions it has identified as being (a) unnecessary backroom duplication and (b) structural impediments to better care; for what reason, and how it plans to address these.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-01336 on 29 July 2016. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 July 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 29 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what evidence it has that reducing the number of NHS boards would improve the service to patients.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-01336 on 29 July 2016. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 08 July 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 29 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what planning (a) has been conducted and (b) is anticipated for the possibility that there will be a reduction in the number of NHS boards.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-01336 on 29 July 2016. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 July 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 29 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government how many people have been removed from the Scottish Tobacco Retailers Register due to offences under the Tobacco and Primary Medical Services (Scotland) Act 2010 in each year, broken down by category of offence.
Answer
In total there have been five tobacco banning orders in the five years since the Tobacco and Primary Medical Services (Scotland) Act 2010 has been introduced.
In 2012–2013 one banning order was issued to a retailer who persistently sold illicit and counterfeit tobacco. In 2013–2014 two banning orders were issued to two different retailers who had sold packets of cigarettes to persons under 18 years old. In 2014–2015 one banning order was issued to a retailer who had sold tobacco to a person under 18 years old. In 2015–2016 one banning order was issued to a retailer selling tobacco in a premises which was not registered.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 June 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 20 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is aware of any occasions when local authorities have disregarded the Statutory guidance to accompany the Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013 with regard to offering direct payments as one of the care options for adults.
Answer
<>The Social Care (Self-directed Support) Act 2013 is founded on the principles of dignity, empowerment and collaboration. It places firm duties on local authorities to offer a range of options for how social care support is delivered and to give individuals the support and information required to enable them to make informed choices. This includes the option of a direct payment. The statutory guidance that accompanies the Act states all options must be described in full.
Under the Direct Payment Regulations 2014 the only circumstance where the authority is not permitted to offer a direct payment is in relation to the provision of long-term residential or nursing care to persons of any age.
The local authority can use a ‘duty of care’ discretion whereby they are not required to offer the option of a direct payment where it is likely that the making of a direct payment will put the safety of the supported person at risk.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 June 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 20 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers it important that a person’s human rights are considered when deciding on an appropriate care placement.
Answer
The Social Care (Self-directed Support) Act 2013 is founded on the principles of dignity, empowerment and collaboration. It places firm duties on local authorities to offer a range of options for how social care support is delivered and to give individuals the support and information required to enable them to make informed choices.
The statutory guidance accompanying the Act makes it clear that any assessment, communication or provision of support must be made in accordance with the statutory principles and values: participation, dignity, involvement, informed choice, and collaboration and respect a person's human rights.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 June 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 20 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it is aware of any challenges by local authorities to the Statutory guidance to accompany the Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013.
Answer
The Social Care (Self-directed Support) Act 2013 is founded on the principles of dignity, empowerment and collaboration. It places firm duties on local authorities to offer a range of options for how social care support is delivered and to give individuals the support and information required to enable them to make informed choices.
Since 2011 the Scottish Government has invested £28.5 million in local authorities to support system and culture change, with a further £3.52 million committed for the financial year 2016-17. We continue to work with local authorities directly and through COSLA to support them to implement self-directed support in line with the legislation and in the spirit of the guidance.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 June 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 20 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers that all adults with care requirements should be provided with a timely and accurate needs assessment and whether this should be taken into account when making any care arrangements.
Answer
<>Local authorities have a duty under the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968 to assess a person’s care needs. The statutory guidance accompanying the Social Care (Self-directed Support) (Scotland) Act 2013 makes it clear that any assessment, communication or provision of support must be made in accordance with the statutory principles and values: participation, dignity, involvement, informed choice, and collaboration and respect a person's human rights.
The Scottish Government would always expect social care assessments to be carried out as timeously as possible. For those who are assessed as being at critical or substantial risk there is a maximum waiting time of six weeks, from confirmation of need to the delivery of free personal and nursing care services.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 June 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 18 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will place in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) copies of the risk register for the Queensferry Crossing from each month of construction.
Answer
The Forth Crossing Bridge Constructor risk register and Transport Scotland risk register for the Forth Replacement Crossing Project will not be placed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) because disclosure of this particular information would, or would be likely to, prejudice substantially the commercial management of an on-going contract between Scottish Ministers and Forth Crossing Bridge Constructors.
- Asked by: Alex Cole-Hamilton, MSP for Edinburgh Western, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 June 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 18 July 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will place in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) a copy of the revised Forth Crossing Bridge Constructors (FCBC) programme referred to by the Cabinet Secretary for Economy, Jobs and Fair Work on 8 June 2016 (Official Report, c. 19).
Answer
The revised Forth Crossing Bridge Constructor’s programme I referred to on 8 June 2016 is held by Forth Crossing Bridge Constructor’s. The Forth Crossing Bridge Constructor’s programme will not be placed in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) because disclosure of this particular information would, or would be likely to, prejudice substantially the commercial management of an on-going contract between Scottish Ministers and Forth Crossing Bridge Constructors.