Seòmar agus comataidhean

Responsibility for the implementation of community planning lies with the partnerships themselves. This information is not held centrally.

 

Responsibility for the implementation of community planning lies with the partnerships themselves. This information is not held centrally.

 

Responsibility for the implementation of community planning lies with the partnerships themselves. This information is not held centrally.

 

Responsibility for the implementation of community planning lies with the partnerships themselves. This information is not held centrally.

 

The Scottish Government firmly believes that partnership working is key to making the best use of available resources and improving efficiency and effectiveness in the delivery of public services. In particular, we are seeking efficiency savings across public services of 3 per cent for 2011-12, with each delivery body expected to report publicly on their plans to improve the efficiency of public services, actions undertaken and results achieved.

The work of social inclusion partnerships (SIPs) is now integrated into community planning partnerships (CPPs). Responsibility for the implementation of community planning lies with the partnerships themselves.

The Scottish Government is committed to the principle of partnership working that delivers outcomes that matter for local people. Audit Scotland carry out risk-based best value audits of local authorities, including community planning. Reports of the audits are in the public domain. Audit Scotland is also planning to undertake a review of community planning partnerships in 2011-12 to assess their effectiveness.

In assessing the overall level of funding to be provided to local authorities in 2011-12, the Scottish Government has negotiated a funding package with the COSLA leadership. For each local authority to secure its share of that package, it will be required to agree to deliver certain commitments, including continuing to work with the Scottish Government towards implementation of the Carers and Young Carers Strategy at local level, including the maintenance of an extra 10,000 weeks respite care. Under the terms negotiated, if Glasgow City Council agrees to deliver the full package, its overall resource funding for 2011-12 will be reduced by 2.6% compared to the funding it received in 2010-11. If the council chooses not to agree to the full package, its resource funding will be reduced by 6.4%.

A provisional funding allocation of the total local government settlement to each council for 2011-12 will be announced to the Parliament in a statement in early December 2010, accompanied by a finance circular issued to local authorities. The provisional allocation will be calculated on the basis that all local authorities will agree the terms of the package. Subject to their responses, final amounts will then be confirmed in two stages, first in a local government finance order which will be laid for parliamentary approval in February 2011, following the passage of the Budget Bill, and second in an amendment order to be laid in March 2011 after all local authorities have set their council tax levels for 2011-12.

Within the total to be provided to Glasgow City Council, under the terms of the local government funding settlement, ring fencing for specific services has largely been removed. As a result, whether or not Glasgow City Council agrees to the package, funding for respite care within the total it receives will not be separately identified. It will be for the council to determine what it spends on respite care.

Between 2007-08 and 2009-10, Glasgow City Council''s recorded respite provision decreased by 3,560 weeks.

The Scottish Government provided an extra £4.19 million over two years to local authorities on top of the overall settlement to enable local authorities to deliver in full by 2010-11 the commitment in the concordat to progress towards delivering 10,000 extra respite weeks. Of this extra £4.19 million, the allocation in 2009-10 is £1.370 million, intended to help deliver an increase of 6,000 weeks in that year. Glasgow''s share of this was £0.165 million which would equate to an additional 240 weeks. Both the interim target of 6,000 weeks by 2009-10 and the 2010-11 target of 10,000 weeks are Scotland-wide. These weeks have not been apportioned amongst local authorities. This reflects both the fact that the concordat commitment is Scotland-wide and the different costs associated with different types of respite. It is noted that 24 local authorities contributed positively to the delivery of the additional 8,950 respite weeks recorded in 2009-10.