The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1293 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I am very reassured.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I thank Mr Simpson for coming along. In the light of what he has said, I have no further questions.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I am sorry to jump on board, but I think that that power does exist within law. If a local councillor does not appear at a council meeting for six months, they are automatically struck off and there has to be a by-election. That power does exist and it is interesting that there is a six-month rule for local government.
Just to show how nerdy I am, I know that City of Edinburgh Council had to pass a special motion last month because one councillor had not attended for five months and was about to be struck off. Councillors can give special reasons for not attending. It might be worth looking at the local government powers that already exist.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
In a previous report, the committee looked at childcare in rural and urban settings. One of the big issues, particularly for women, is the provision at the start of the day and at weekends. If someone works as a carer or nurse and starts at 7 or 7.30 in the morning, there is no provision. For someone who works shift work at weekends, there is very little nursery provision. My question goes beyond your remit and into other areas, but, in general, what is the Scottish Government doing to provide targeted childcare support? We have heard that one of the big issues is that many people cannot go back into employment because the hours that they work do not fit with childcare provision.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning. We have already spoken quite a lot about gathering evidence and being robust, so I will move on to childcare expansion. The second delivery plan included a range of pilots to test and learn from approaches that have been taken. How much information have you gathered from those pilots? How will that contribute to the development of next year’s plan?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. I would welcome that.
Regarding gathering evidence, we are now coming to the end of the second delivery plan, and you are working on the third delivery plan. I go back to Liz Smith’s point about things changing. How school meals are paid for has changed in the past 10 years. What was working 10 years ago might not work now and, to some extent, you have to look into a crystal ball and think about where things will go in the next three to five years. How are you gathering evidence, and how robust is that evidence?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
On data sharing, one of the biggest frustrations that not just MSPs but everyone has, is that we cannot get beyond looking at it, for some reason. It would be interesting to get a bit more information on that.
My final question is on two areas. First, when we look at evidence on tackling child poverty, is there any evidence on giving money to families that shows how much that is benefiting the children and how much it is benefiting other members of that family? I appreciate that there is a very close link, but is there any way of identifying how much of the money that is going to a family is actually benefiting the children?
Secondly, going back to the previous comment, how much are you looking at what should be universal and what should be more targeted? Is this an opportunity for the Scottish Government to go through each of the different tools and benefits that we are using and say that we are moving to plan 3 and we might want take a more targeted than universal approach?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I appreciate that it does not come under the minister’s portfolio, but could she get the appropriate minister to write to the committee so that we can get the date of when the review is likely to be complete, and get the outcome of the review?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I appreciate that.
We will come on to universal credit in a moment, but I will first ask about split payments, which you mentioned in your statement. The Social Security (Scotland) Act 2018 would enable the introduction of split payments for benefits administered by Social Security Scotland. I appreciate that it is not in your portfolio, but do you have an update on how the process for split payments, particularly for those in domestic abuse situations, is going in relation to benefits that fall under the remit of Social Security Scotland?
09:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I appreciate that the matter is not in the minister’s portfolio, but it has been 10 months since the letter was written. The cabinet secretary has met her counterpart at Westminster. I am not expecting an answer to this today, but can we have an update on how the discussions went and the timescales that we looking at for making progress on that?