The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1256 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Could you speak up slightly? I am having a slightly difficult time hearing you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
It is the first of those that I am asking about.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful. The Legal Aid Board funds the Edinburgh Women’s Aid project, which provides quick access to specialist legal advice on family-related issues. Going forward, could that model be replicated in other parts of the country? Could it be scaled up to cover rural areas and places outwith Edinburgh?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I will come to the courts in a moment. In a previous century, when I was doing legal aid work, which was mostly civil, my understanding was that getting automatic legal aid was a fairly short procedure—it was a one-off for a year and it was for advice and assistance or whatever. Would the Law Society suggest that legal aid should be for the whole case, including if it went to an appeal, or are you suggesting that it should be for the initial meeting with the client and the initial paperwork? How long is the piece of string that you are suggesting with regard to domestic abuse cases?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is really helpful. Remind me—did you say that it is a year-long project?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Have you looked at what type of firms are no longer doing a little bit of civil legal aid work? Is it sole practitioners or middle-sized firms, for example? Has the Law Society or the Scottish Legal Aid Board done any work on the types of firms that are doing civil legal aid work, compared to those who were doing it 20 or 30 years ago?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Okay. Perhaps my colleagues are too nice to ask this question, but I will ask it of the Law Society: is that simply because legal aid work does not pay enough money? Are solicitors choosing not to do that work—particularly family and civil legal aid work—because they are not getting what they think is enough of a return from it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Apologies, but I would like to seek clarification from Colin Lancaster. You said that there has been no reduction in the total number of solicitors doing legal aid, which would include criminal and civil law cases. Has the number of solicitors who are practising civil and, particularly, family law fallen?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
The Law Society’s submission suggests extending civil legal aid automatically to those with domestic abuse cases. I wonder whether I can explore that a wee bit. First, how would that work in practice? Who would make the decision about whether it was a domestic abuse case or some other case? Secondly—this is probably a more difficult question for Colin Lancaster—do you have any concept of how much that would cost the Scottish Legal Aid Board or the Scottish Government and, ultimately, the taxpayer?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Okay, that would be helpful. I go back to my million-dollar question, but it might be slightly more than that. How much do you think that could cost?
10:00