The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1244 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
The other example that academics raised with us last week related to someone going on to a submarine for a long period of service or going away for a long period of time. Do such issues concern you in practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That was helpful.
Convener, I appreciate that we probably do not want to rewrite the law of succession on a Tuesday morning, but I think that the bill slightly opens a can of worms. Last week, with the academics, we looked at whether there should be a greater restriction on legal rights in this respect. I understand that, in some continental European countries such as Poland and Germany, people can write into their will clauses that do not to get rid of such rights completely but, certainly, dilute them further than we have.
I appreciate that I am again putting the witnesses on the spot by asking them to comment, but is that area worth pursuing, or have we struck the right balance on legal rights?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Would the bill require further amendment?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
For the avoidance of doubt, I just want to say that one of the witnesses today, John McArthur, is a personal friend of mine from many years ago when I was a trainee with Anderson Strathern. Also, Alan Barr, who is on the second panel, was one of my lecturers at university.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will pick up on a couple of those issues. Someone on the first panel made a suggestion about getting medical evidence. Do you think that a requirement to provide medical evidence would be helpful in giving protection to a trustee who has been challenged on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning. I thank all of you for coming to the meeting.
The bill contains some new powers for sheriff courts, but the Court of Session will remain the main court for trusts. Do you think that the balance is about right in that respect, or should more be done—or be allowed to be done—in the sheriff courts instead of things going to the Court of Session?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I declared my interests before the previous panel of witnesses.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
One of the questions was about trustee insurance. If that became mandatory, would that resolve the issue in regard to individual liability?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will develop the idea slightly by asking about clarity for trustees. If a charity has an asset and wants to give that to another charity, the general view is that the trustees have to get the best value that they can for that sale, but trustees who are passing an asset on to another charity with a similar charitable basis might want to sell it at a cheaper price. Is there a need for clarity on that in the bill, or is there already enough clarity to allow trustees to do that?
When I worked for a charity, we talked to another charity and asked whether the trustees could sell us an asset at a discount price so that we could use it for charitable purposes, but they said that they had to get the best price for their beneficiaries. Could some clarity be provided about a situation in which another trust benefits?