The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1244 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Jeremy Balfour
My apologies, convener. I do not have that in front of me. Could someone else ask it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Jeremy Balfour
I have two questions. I would like to follow that up by asking whether the data that you are getting from Social Security Scotland is sufficient. Are there areas that you think we should be recording that have not been recorded as yet?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you, convener. I hope that you can hear me.
Good morning, panel. I am a wee bit confused about this, because the criteria are exactly the same for ADP and PIP—there is no difference between the two—so, surely, the awards in England match the awards in Scotland. Whether someone applies for PIP in England or for ADP in Scotland, the criteria are the same, so they should get the same decision. Are you noticing different decision making north and south of the border?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful. You have mentioned the Social Security (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill. The committee is scrutinising the bill and we are carrying out a consultation. With your experience, if you could make one change to the bill, what would you add to it that is not in there at the moment?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That is absolutely fine.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, Dr Witcher. I am sorry that I am not with you in person, but thank you for the evidence that you have given so far.
You were around during the passage of the Social Security (Scotland) Bill. One of the questions that we asked at the time was whether the charter should have legal authority behind it. The committee and, indeed, the Government said no to that question. Should we revisit that? Does the charter need a legal basis so that people can challenge it in some way, or is it working as it is at the moment?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you—that was helpful.
I just have a couple of quick questions. The first is about an issue that has already been addressed with the convener. The timescales on which you were asked to respond to consultation documents presented a challenge. Will you outline how the process worked? Did you have enough time to respond to the documents, particularly the ones on regulations, which were very detailed?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
What about informal involvement?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you very much. That is helpful.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
We heard evidence last week that you need technical and scientific expertise to be able to advise the Scottish and UK bodies. Are there enough people out there to give that advice?