The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1293 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I thank the witnesses for coming in this morning.
I want to explore two areas under this theme, the first of which Emma Jackson and Chris Birt have already picked up on. The criteria for ADP—which, I should acknowledge, I am in receipt of—and PIP are almost identical for most individuals. ADP acts as a passport to other benefits, which are reserved at present. If the PIP criteria are changed and the Scottish Government decides not to go down that road, what concerns do you have that the UK Government might then not use ADP as a passport to those benefits? What implications would that have for people in Scotland?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, and thank you all for coming along.
I understand that, in some circumstances, victims/survivors can be exempt from sanctions. How well do those exemptions work in practice? Can they be improved?
Erica, you look as though you want to come in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Chris, do you have the answer?
10:45Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I thank everyone for their answers. It is disappointing that the Secretary of State for Scotland and the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions have not been willing to come and give evidence to the committee, because the questions, particularly those posed by Sally Witcher, are ones that the committee would want to pursue. However, we are unable to do so, due to their lack of availability.
I am conscious of time, convener, so I will move on to the million-dollar—or in fact billion-dollar—question. The Scottish Fiscal Commission has identified that, by 2029-30, the Scottish Government will need to find approximately £2 billion if we are to continue down the road that we are on. That can be found if more money comes from the UK Government—or from tax-raising powers here in Scotland, although they are limited—or it can come from cutting other services and budgets. I appreciate that this is the question that none of you wants to answer, but what would you suggest that the next Scottish Government should do to find that £2 billion?
I will start with the economist.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I do not think that we want to go back to the system that we had before this, where people went to the sheriff court to deal with the whole process. Can the issue be solved by fundamental change, or do we need to take the time to start again and look at a completely different model of delivering the service?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I will move on to split payments, which have been talked about since universal credit came into existence. I think that we are getting closer to the point where everyone will be transferred to UC. How high up your list of priorities for changes to UC are split payments? I appreciate that there is a lot about UC that you want to see changed, but do split payments make the top 10 or the top five, for example?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Do the other two witnesses want to come in on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Could you speak up slightly? I am having a slightly difficult time hearing you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
It is the first of those that I am asking about.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful. The Legal Aid Board funds the Edinburgh Women’s Aid project, which provides quick access to specialist legal advice on family-related issues. Going forward, could that model be replicated in other parts of the country? Could it be scaled up to cover rural areas and places outwith Edinburgh?