The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1455 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. As you point out, that is probably outwith the scope of the bill, but your comments have been noted and others can consider them.
David Woods, you are the legal expert. Are you happy that parties can contract out of the provisions of the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
As David Woods mentioned, the bill is limited to reforming certain aspects of the law of contract and providing certain remedies for breach of contract. Do you think that the bill should be broader, or does it do enough?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, and thank you all for coming this morning. I will move us on slightly, and I will start with you, Colin Borland. What are your views on parties being able to contract out of the provisions of the bill? You mentioned that point in your written submission.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, Sarah. In your opening remarks you mentioned issues around public bodies, and we have heard quite a lot of evidence on that. Your bill includes references to public bodies promoting wellbeing and sustainable development. Should the bill require “delivery” rather than “promotion”?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
We have received evidence that obligations on sustainable development
“must be fulfilled before and at the time when a particular policy is being considered or decision taken.”
How will the legislation ensure that, in practice, obligations will be met at the point of delivery?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I have a brief question. Did you think of using regulations, which obviously have greater legal standing, rather than guidance, or did guidance seem the best way to do it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Again, my questions are nerdy but important, so I will go further. The bill also includes the phrase “have regard to” in respect of guidance that is to be produced by the future generations commissioner.
Caroline Mair may give the same answer, but could that wording be strengthened, or is the terminology understood by the public bodies and by courts?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful.
As you said, Sarah, there has been quite a lot of discussion around terminology and words. The bill, as you have drafted it, refers to the need for public bodies to
“have due regard for the need to promote wellbeing and sustainable development.”
We have heard in evidence that that could be strengthened. Do you agree that it needs to be strengthened? If so, how would you envisage that being done through an amendment at stage 2 or stage 3?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I suppose that my concern is this. Let us say that it is a Friday afternoon and somebody is sitting in an office, and they say, “Oh—we’ve got to do this”. It is a tick-box exercise, and they just tick a box to say, “Yes, we’ve looked at it.” Given that, as you say, guidance is not legally enforceable, the bill may not actually bring about any change. How do we avoid that and give the duty more teeth?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I confess that I did not fully understand the first point that the minister made on amendment 26. The centres would not be looking at children’s needs in particular; they would be undertaking a full review in relation to the issue. I also think that we have to recognise that the equipment that I mentioned earlier does not come cheaply, and a major financial investment will be required if it is to be provided. It is unrealistic to expect some of the smaller education facilities to be able to make that investment quickly. That is why I think that it would be helpful to have an overall review and then see where funding will be required.