Seòmar agus comataidhean

That is helpful background, Graham. I will direct this question back to you, but I ask for a briefer answer. If the policy that was announced by the Home Secretary last week is carried out, is there enough appropriate housing in places such as Glasgow, Edinburgh and other parts of Scotland to accommodate those individuals? I know that Edinburgh often struggles to give any support because it does not have the accommodation. Across Scotland, do we have that accommodation or will we need more new builds and other properties that come on to the market?

Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Some of you might have heard the questions that we put to the previous panel, and the questions that I ask now will be similar.

I will pick up the issue of the overreliance on the central belt to accommodate people. Does anyone have a view on whether there should be distribution across the whole of Scotland? If so, what are some of the challenges with regard to that? If you do not have anything particularly new to say, you can just agree with previous comments, but it would be interesting to know your opinion on whether services that individuals need, such as legal or health services, can be provided across Scotland, or whether is it better to keep the provision within a small number of local authorities. That question goes to anyone who wants to jump in.

Again, in the interests of time, rather than receiving a verbal update, it would be helpful to get information in writing on my question. When it comes to the Syrian refugees who came into the country, have any lessons—whether positive or negative—been learned? In particular, is there anything that we can learn to do differently?

Good morning and thank you for coming to give evidence. I also thank you for your written evidence, which has already been really helpful. I will start with a question for Graham O’Neill. In the previous session of Parliament, we did some work on the dispersal of refugees and asylum seekers across the whole of Scotland and there were issues with regard to housing and, in particular, access to legal advice outwith the central belt. In principle, do you think that it is a good idea for individuals not only to be placed in Glasgow, Lanarkshire and Edinburgh but to be found accommodation and support in other parts of Scotland as well? If so, how could we do that in a more effective way?

That is right. Outside the Box will offer secretariat work. Obviously, it will be there, but the relationship is slightly different. The organisation is also quite new to the work, so it is just putting its foot into the water. That is the relationship at the moment, but it might well become a member quite quickly.

I am not asking anyone to declare an interest in the matter.

This is a big issue. We have an ageing population, and older people face many challenges. Particularly in the past two years, we have seen the challenges of isolation and of getting back into employment, and we have seen issues with care at home. Without wishing to prejudge, those will be some of the issues on our agenda in the coming months.

If the committee decides this morning to allow the group to go ahead, we will begin by trying to get as much information as possible about the experience of the past two years, so that the cross-party group can feed that into the public inquiry into Covid-19 that will take place. That will give an insight into the experiences of organisations and individuals across Scotland. We will look at other issues after that.

I hope that the group will be able to continue, and I am happy to answer any questions.

This group is slightly different from the two that were previously discussed, because it was the very first cross-party group to be established in the Scottish Parliament, back in 2000. Unfortunately, due to administrative issues and because Sandra White chose not to stand for re-election, we were a little slow in getting our ducks lined up. We have them lined up now and are keen and ready to go.

Without being too rude, I note that the group applies to most of us, because Age Scotland now defines being old as being over 50.

Believe it or not, that list has been culled. The list was twice that size. Before proceeding, we emailed everyone who had been part of the group in the previous Parliament, but about half of them had moved on or were no longer involved. It is a large group.

On Tuesday, we had a meeting of the cross-party group on disability, and it was interesting that almost everybody wanted to do it by Zoom. That makes a massive difference. Instead of having to come here, as used to be the case, people can log in whether they are in Inverness, Aberdeen or elsewhere. That will probably be the model that we look at in the future, at least for the majority of our meetings, because it means that people can take part.

It is a large group, so we have an official smaller working group that meets to set the agenda, which is then fed into the wider group for approval. For me, having a larger group is a positive, because there is such diversity. If you have 50 to 100-plus people, that is a lot of different interests, and some people are working, some are retired and so on.

In the previous parliamentary session, when we used to meet here, we had to take the largest meeting room, because it was jam-packed. We hope to have some face-to-face meetings as well.

Thank you.

Looking at the numbers that we have, I see that Glasgow is taking the overwhelming majority of individuals and central Scotland is taking the rest. One of the issues that we looked at in the previous parliamentary session was whether there should be a greater distribution of individuals across the whole of Scotland, which would have advantages and disadvantages. Based on the figures, and starting with the Western Isles, do you think it would be more helpful if people who came here were distributed across the whole of Scotland, rather than in one or two local authority areas?