The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1169 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
I appreciate that that is the perennial question that is raised at budget revisions. As I have said at previous budget revisions, the allocation of the budget to particular portfolios reflects the policy intent. It is money to support health. It is not money for local government in the sense of the services that local government routinely provides.
There is a question here that goes back to the point about transparency and clarity. Is it health spend or is it spend in another area? I think that we all recognise that it is health spend but that it is delivered within a different portfolio.
Again, this is something on which I would welcome the committee’s considered reflections. If there is a desire to move in that direction and a view that, in tandem with other potential reforms with regard to presentation, that would aid transparency, I think that it will be something that we will be happy to consider. Ultimately, however, in relation to allocating the budget and being able to identify what is spent on health, that is why we start with the health portfolio, just as we start with the education portfolio in relation to the money that is spent on education, and so on.
11:00Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
On pensions, I will bring in Craig Maidment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
Is that with regard to this financial year?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
I cannot provide any detail on that, I am afraid, in the context of giving evidence on the SBR, but I am happy to take that away and write to you. I apologise that I cannot provide that detail now.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
It will be, but the process that is in place allows for year-on-year comparison of spending in particular areas, so if we were to change the approach it would make that comparison more challenging.
I recognise your point about comparing the spring budget revision with the autumn revision in the document rather than comparing the spring budget revision with the budget act as passed. If we pass a budget in which we see spending in health that does not start off in health, I can understand that some would argue that that could be a source of confusion, or that it could be seen as not optimal for transparency.
However, there are trade-offs. I understand your point: why have that transfer take place if it is understood that the intention is, and past patterns of budget demonstrate, that the spend will end up in a particular area? However, there is an advantage in having clarity about the policy intent of the spend.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
This statutory instrument specifies the standard rate and lower rate for the Scottish landfill tax, which would apply from 1 April. These rates are consistent with those set out in the Scottish budget for 2023-24, which was published on 15 December 2022. The order sets out that the standard rate will increase from £98.60 per tonne to £102.10 per tonne. The lower rate for less polluting inert material will increase from £3.15 per tonne to £3.25 per tonne. Committee members will wish to note that these rates match landfill tax rates in the rest of the UK for the financial year 2023-24, as confirmed in the UK and Welsh budgets.
The Scottish Government is continuing to act to avoid any potential for what is referred to as “waste tourism” to emerge as a result of material differences between the tax rates north and south of the border. The increased rates provide appropriate financial incentives to support delivery of our ambitious waste and circular economy targets.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
I am conscious that the committee has previously taken an interest in the resourcing and budgeting of the student loan book, and we provided further information to the committee on the modelling that informs that.
If the committee is interested in getting a more technical breakdown of, and more background on, how those pension calculations and annually managed expenditure lines are arrived at, I would be happy to provide that in writing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
We are absolutely committed to our net zero targets. The reality is that the schemes are demand led, and demand is impacted by a number of factors. We have to consider the design and delivery of the schemes, while recognising the prevailing economic circumstances that are impacting across a range of public policy objectives. That is why the Government has been engaging with partners to consider how to ensure that the schemes are more effective in delivering their stated intent.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
Again, if there is a desire for more specific detail on that beyond what I have already said, I am happy to capture that in the letter to the committee.