The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 472 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
The Scottish RAAC campaign group reports that families are living in homes that are literally falling apart. That has left people facing homelessness, rising debt and mental health struggles, as their homes become worthless. The Scottish Government opts to trade blame with Westminster. Will the Scottish Government now commit to providing financial assistance to homeowners who are left in an horrendous situation?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
Analysis that the Scottish Parliament information centre produced late last year shows that the value of international exports from Scotland remains below the Scottish Government’s target of 25 per cent, and that the rest of the UK still accounts for most of Scotland’s services and manufacturing exports. In the light of that, what action is the minister taking to strengthen our vital internal export market? How is he working with the Department for Business and Trade to ensure that Scottish products have access to competitive international markets?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
I am pleased to contribute to this afternoon’s debate, and I thank Clare Adamson for bringing this important issue to the chamber.
Gambling addiction can affect many aspects of someone’s life, including their relationships, their finances and their physical and mental health. It can also affect others around them. Anyone who has seen a family member struggle with gambling addiction will know that all too well.
Data shows that more than 80 per cent of those with a gambling problem reported family or relationship difficulties. Other factors that can increase the risk of developing a gambling addiction include starting gambling at an early age, problems with drugs or alcohol or having a mental health condition.
As we have already heard, such addiction can be problematic for individuals and can lead to criminality. One of the biggest problems is that it can be easy for people to cover up their gambling addiction. In many cases, close friends or family members do not realise anything is wrong until thousands of pounds of debt have already built up.
The wider effects of gambling also extend to the whole economy. Estimates by the Institute for Public Policy Research suggest that problem gambling could be costing Scotland up to £60 million a year. It is also concerning that gambling problems are most common in young adults: it is estimated that 55,000 11 to 16-year-olds have a gambling problem.
A recent survey by the Gambling Commission highlights a worrying trend—that the number of 11 to 17-year olds with signs of problem gambling has more than doubled, compared with the previous year.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
Yes, I do, and I will come on to that later in my speech. It is a massive issue. Some individuals, because they can see no way out of their gambling addiction and feel that they have nowhere to go, consider suicide, and it is problematic if they do not get the support that they require.
I welcome services such as those provided by GamCare and by organisations such as Gambling Leap, which was founded by Fife resident Colin Brown. Drawing on his own experience with gambling, which cost him more than £250,000, Colin launched Gambling Leap to support others and help free them from that addiction.
Organisations such as Gambling Leap are an important part of tackling the problem. We, and the Government, must consider our part in that. The introduction of a maximum stake on fixed-odds betting terminals in 2018 was a welcome step—but it was only a step.
I was pleased that, in 2020, the previous Conservative United Kingdom Government reviewed the Gambling Act 2005, and that, in 2023, it published a white paper on gambling. I welcome that the new Labour UK Government has looked at and is prepared to implement much of what is in the white paper.
However, the Scottish Government also has a role to play in tackling the issue. There has to be wider recognition of gambling and of NHS Scotland’s concerns when it comes to supporting individuals.
The suicide prevention action plan is about ensuring that people are able to access the correct treatment across health and social care services. However, it is a problem that we still do not have any specialist national health service clinics for people with a gambling addiction in Scotland.
I urge the Scottish Government to recognise the challenges of gambling addiction and the damage that it can cause to so many people’s lives, and to ensure that every community has access to the high-quality support services that will fully support their needs. I look forward to the minister saying that that is the case when she makes her speech.
17:24Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
Can the cabinet secretary confirm whether the energy strategy will be issued before the summer recess—yes or no?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
I am delighted to be able to close this debate on behalf of the Scottish Conservatives, and I will be supporting the amendment in the name of my colleague Stephen Kerr.
Once again, today’s debate could have been an opportunity to discuss how best Scotland can exist in today’s Europe. It was a chance to highlight opportunities for improved collaboration within the European Union and with our European neighbours as the trading relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union continues to develop.
However, one look at the Government’s motion makes it quite clear that the Scottish Government wanted to have a debate on other topics. Indeed, the Scottish Government is rerunning debates on single market membership, customs union membership and freedom of movement. The Government knows that that shopping list is a complete fantasy. However, that did not stop it taking the opportunity this afternoon to stand up and say its piece, so it is important that we do the same.
Instead of setting out a pragmatic and bold vision for how Scotland can exist alongside the European Union, the Scottish Government wants to reopen old wounds and repeat arguments as if it were 2019 again. As usual, the Scottish Government is spending yet more chamber time debating entirely reserved matters.
We should be talking today about what is happening in our education system. We could be talking about what is happening with delayed infrastructure projects, such as those on roads. We could be discussing other devolved matters. However, that is not what the Scottish Government wants—once again, it wants to focus on constitutional grievance.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
Yesterday, we were talking about the economy of Scotland and how jobs are being lost in a sector that is vital to this country and our future economic stability.
The Scottish Government says that it is concerned about economic damage, while ignoring the fact that, if we had Scottish independence, we would have economic chaos. The centre for economic performance at the London School of Economics has said that
“disrupting trade with the rest of the UK could lower Scottish income per capita by at least 6 per cent.”
Given that Scotland exports three times more to the rest of the UK than to the European Union, that is not surprising; nor is it surprising that, according to the Fraser of Allander Institute, more than 500,000 jobs are linked to trade with the rest of the United Kingdom.
The Scottish Government wants to gloss over the problems of rejoining the European Union. It says that it would be quite an easy thing to achieve, but is glossing over many of the issues that it would face.
Earlier this month, the United Kingdom Government concluded a comprehensive trade deal with India. That is a real opportunity. The deal is the result of several years of negotiation. Although the current UK Government was able to finalise the deal, it was the previous Conservative Government that laid the foundations on which that agreement could be reached.
I know how hard the Scottish whisky industry fought to ensure that that vital sector is central to the trade deal. When I met the Indian trade minister two years ago, he told me that he had never seen a country fight so hard for one particular industry. We have all been fighting for that industry, because we know that it will bring us prosperity and opportunity and will give us jobs in our communities.
The deal will reduce tariffs on Scottish whisky from 150 per cent to 75 per cent, and will further reduce them to 40 per cent within 10 years. It could increase whisky exports by at least £1 billion in the next five years, bringing money into our economy. We should be celebrating that.
The deal will also create countless jobs and opportunities across the sector. The Scotch Whisky Association has called the deal “transformational” and “a landmark moment”. That is very much the case.
The crucial thing here, though, is that that deal would not have been possible if the UK were still a part of the EU. I want more of that—I want trade deals in other areas. It is quite telling that the SNP Government was unable to celebrate the deal, despite the significant possibilities and prospects for Scotland that it brings.
There are also many future opportunities for Scotland, as the United Kingdom engages with faster-growing markets across Asia, Africa and the Americas. I hope that the Scottish Government can at least try to welcome some of the opportunities that lie ahead in those continents, because they are immense and will give businesses and individuals opportunities to prosper.
I turn to some of the speeches that we have heard this afternoon. The cabinet secretary spoke about a reset summit that is to take place in the next week or so, and about the challenges, hopes, aspirations and opportunities that it presents. However, we must think about the defence and security challenges. The cabinet secretary also spoke about the Prime Minister’s recent comments being “a new low for Labour.”
My colleague Stephen Kerr gave a passionate speech, as we would expect. He talked about the SNP once again wanting to break up the United Kingdom. The SNP wants to rejoin the EU, abandon processes and drop red lines. However, the biggest issue that Mr Kerr discussed was access to fishing rights and how that issue has been manipulated in the past few days. If what we are hearing is being considered behind closed doors is true, that would be a backward step for everybody.
Taking back control has been touched on. So far, 70 trade deals have been signed—those are opportunities that this country would not have had if we had still been a member of the EU. As I said, the trade deal with India will create real prosperity for the nation.
It has been mentioned that secret summits are under way in which the possibility of giving away fishing grounds is being considered. As we all know, the SNP—the Scottish nationalists—wish to split and take away many of those fishing grounds.
Neil Bibby talked about the politics of the issue. He, too, touched on the UK-EU reset that is about to take place. He spoke about the Scottish nationalists grandstanding and about how the SNP’s record on Europe has not always been as clear as it was presented today.
I pay tribute to Alex Cole-Hamilton for discussing the Ukraine war and for his recent visit to Ukraine to deliver ambulances from Scotland. That was very bold, and I pay tribute to him for that. He spoke about the freedoms that we enjoy in the United Kingdom, security issues, the fact that Scotland has a place in Europe—there is no doubt about that—and the proposed plans for a reset. He also talked about where we can work together.
Instead of our having a meaningful debate about Scotland’s future relationship with Europe, we have had the usual grievance and received lectures from many members in the chamber. We want Scotland to be part of an outward-looking United Kingdom in which we can collaborate closely with the EU while embracing the opportunities from free trade with the rest of the world. That is what we need, and that is we want to create. That is what we need, and that is what we want to capitalise on. That is what we need, and that is what we will stand up for.
16:46Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
The Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers and the Scottish Chambers of Commerce have written to the Scottish Government to highlight their concerns and to suggest constructive solutions for the review of the policy. Given the importance of self-catering to the Scottish tourism economy, to which it contributes almost £1 billion, does the cabinet secretary agree that the current unfortunate situation needs to be addressed rapidly, before long-term damage is done to the sector?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
To ask the Scottish Government what engagement it has undertaken with stakeholders in response to reported concerns regarding the implementation of the revised non-domestic rates processes for self-catering operators. (S6O-04660)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Alexander Stewart
Plans to build affordable homes for disabled residents in Clackmannan have been delayed while costs are recalculated. The council previously laid proposals to construct bungalows on a site in the town, but those proposals have now been reduced. Given the urgent requirements for more accessible housing in my region, what assurances can the Scottish Government give that it will do all that it can to maximise the availability for that much-needed development to progress?