The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 751 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
It would also be useful to write to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service to seek information about the number of cases of motorcycle theft in each of the past five years and the outcomes of those cases.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
You have touched on population issues. We know that NHS boards with larger populations have mental health assessment units that are available 24/7. That is really useful for larger populations, but the issue is in trying to evaluate these services, cabinet secretary. Is the Scottish Government looking to make it much more of a national service? You have touched on the issue of rural areas, where, as you have identified, it is a much bigger challenge for you to make that happen. There is a disparity between what happens in urban areas and what happens in rural areas, which do not have the same support and opportunities, and patients might fall through the gap.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
This has been an eye-opening session, minister, and I am staggered at some of the responses so far—at the complete lack of understanding of the situation and circumstances that we have heard.
On the licensing system, the Scottish Government says:
“The Scottish Government believes that the licensing scheme for the control of mountain hares … does not impact on the ability of falconers to enable their birds to exhibit normal behaviour patterns.”
We have heard that the licensing scheme is completely and utterly unworkable, so do you believe that statement? It is not the position of the profession, which is able to understand what is taking place, but the Scottish Government fundamentally believes that it is the case. Do you still believe that it is?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
You are indicating that the majority of the 21 licences are for shooting. Is that the case?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
So only one licence has been requested that would deal with birds of prey.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
There are many merits in the petition, convener, and it is important that we write to seek the views of stakeholders on the action that it calls for. Those might include COSLA, Early Years Scotland, the Scottish Childminding Association, and the National Parent Forum of Scotland. They could all give us a good indication of views about the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
I think that further information is required in order for us to continue with the petition. I suggest that we write to the Scottish Government to seek its response to the recommendations that are proposed by the Scottish Law Commission in its report on cohabitation and the timetable for bringing forward legislation in that area. I also suggest that we write to the Scottish Law Commission to seek information on what consideration has been given to the use of judicial discretion as part of the review on aspects of family law. In addition, I suggest that we write to the Law Society of Scotland and Family Law Association to seek their views on the issues that are raised by the petitioner. I think that all of those suggestions have some merit.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
It was about the further developments that are planned and about how families who are affected by suicide are supported.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
I think that we should take more evidence on the subject. I suggest that we write to the Society of Chief Officers of Transportation in Scotland, the Confederation of Passenger Transport, and Heads of Planning Scotland, seeking their views on the petition and asking how the views of the taxi and private hire trade are included in their decision-making processes, what scope there is to include the taxi and private hire trade in public transport stakeholder groups, and how engagement and consultation on decisions that affect the services that they provide could be improved.
I suggest that we also write to the Scottish Government to seek an update on what is happening with the short-life working group and to ask for further information on any action that is being undertaken to improve engagement between the taxi and private hire industry and the planning and licensing authorities. That would give us an indication of where we are in the process.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
That information gap might well have been identified, minister, and you have now indicated that through other resources and ways of managing it, it might be closed. We are trying to identify whether such a gap exists—and it would appear that it does—and whether everyone is supported while in custody.