The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 801 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Alexander Stewart
I would like to extend the point about engagement. It would be good for us to get a flavour of what has been happening as regards engagement with the community and the business sector. I believe that a community engagement forum is held in the community. Could you give us a flavour of what has been discussed at the forum and how issues have been addressed? Has that vehicle been used? If so, have you found it useful in managing the situation in the community? Are there areas that you have concerns about?
09:30Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Alexander Stewart
Is the business involved in the forum?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Alexander Stewart
Tricia, do you have any involvement with the forum? Is the community council involved in it?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Alexander Stewart
Minister, back in September, you gave a statement in which you spoke about trying to publish the plan for the next phase of the mission and said that you wanted to ensure that there was enough funding to deliver the next phase. It would be good to get a sense of how you see that progressing. Are you ensuring that you do not lose any momentum in managing the national mission work as it progresses?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
That is probably enough from me, convener. Unless anyone else has anything to say, I am content.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
You have touched on auditing and the assurance requirements. What are your views on how the Scottish Government has managed that work and on the plans that it has updated? Do you think that it is being realistic, or is it trying to be a bit too ambitious? Will the timescales that it has set out be met?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
Do you have a similar view, Bryan?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
John, do you think that the Scottish Government has got some of that right?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
I want to go back to the quality of assessment and the assurance of governance when it comes to the assessments. We have touched on the fact that several assessors are required to carry out the work to make sure that a rating is the case.
You have indicated that, as landlords, you want to make sure that you get the right assessment and do the right things in a property. We believe that we may have enough assessors to cover the process, but there may be some logjams in the system in relation to how the process is managed and how effective it is. The success of the system is dependent on having enough people to make sure that individuals such as you are managing to fulfil the needs in the timescales. If you do not do that, there may be penalties later in the process.
Can you give a flavour of how the assessment process should work in some areas? Will it work on the timescales that you want for your organisations—and for individuals who have such facilities—or will it cause continuing difficulties? If it will cause difficulty to a landlord, will they just sell up because, as has been said, it is not worth the hassle of going through the process?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Alexander Stewart
We touched earlier on enforcement and penalties, which might have to become part of the process as the policy expands and goes further. Do you have views on how that will work? Some people on the previous panel felt that if there is too much enforcement and there are penalties attached to it, people would be put off and they would end up selling. That would potentially make things even worse.
