The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 922 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
I thank the witnesses for their comments so far. Regulations always have an impact, and it has been obvious from your evidence that the regulations have a potential negative impact on the housing supply. As you have already indicated, landlords have left the sector and more might do so when the regulations are brought in and have that negative impact.
Risks are involved, and you have all been quite articulate about where you see them. What should we do to mitigate those risks and to try to support the housing supply? As you have identified, we might be losing that supply and the landlords because of the risks to the sector and to the industry that those regulations might bring.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
We have heard that regulations can have an impact on the sector, which could be positive or negative. We are asking about how that impact happens. The proposed regulations might well have a negative impact. The sector, which is a supplier of housing, has been talking about that, because some landlords might feel that they need to leave the market if they are not able to comply with the regulations. There is a risk to supply in all of this, which could perhaps have even more of an impact on the sector in a rural environment as compared to an urban environment—although it would still have an impact on the latter. If there is a risk, how should we mitigate and manage that risk so that we do not lose the stock and supply in the housing sector that we so badly need?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
My next question is about the enforcement of the proposed regulations. It is important that we get that right. At the moment, local authorities are being earmarked for that role. Are they the suitable bodies to deal with enforcement? It would be good to get your views on that. If they are, sufficient resources will be required to ensure that the measures are effective and efficient. Some local authorities may face a bigger challenge, depending on their size, their capacity and their workforce, on their rurality or urban situation and on how many properties they have to manage.
As we heard earlier, property being left void is not where we want to be. If the proposed regulations have an effect in that respect—if that is a knock-on effect of enforcement—it could jeopardise everything that we are trying to achieve in ensuring that we have more properties, and more properties of the right standard. It will be important to enforce the policy effectively. It would be useful to get a view on that from all of you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
Does anyone else want to add anything?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
Enforcement will also be an issue in the regulatory process, and it is local authorities that will be given that task. It would be interesting to know whether you think that that is the right place to put that task. Do local authorities have sufficient resources to do that effectively? We have already spoken about the fact that the impacts on rural and urban authorities might be different. It will take time and resources to ensure that properties are at the required standard, and you spoke about the knock-on effect of the time spent waiting for voids to be dealt with.
It would be good to get a flavour of what you all think. Is it right to make local authorities responsible? If that is right, how should they be resourced to ensure that the sector gets the required support to be effective and efficient?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
Good morning. In its evidence, the Association of Scottish Self-Caterers suggested that the per-person, per-night option would be problematic in reality. Would the Scottish Government consider removing that option? The association certainly feels that it creates some anomalies and that it would be better if it was not there.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Alexander Stewart
As you rightly identify, we are trying to get the balance right so that there is no burden on those organisations or individuals. The whole idea of a per-person option could be very challenging in some types of accommodation, depending on how many people stay and for how many nights. The sector has said that it opens a can of worms in some ways and that managing it could be unworkable.
How do you gauge, depending on the timescale and length of stay, how many people remain overnight in accommodation, given that their movements vary and they might travel around and return at different times and on different dates? The number of people might cause some difficulties. Do you see the process as unworkable?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Alexander Stewart
Exactly.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Alexander Stewart
What are the key areas of uncertainty in the current forecast of the difference between the block grant adjustment and social security spending?