The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 850 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
Under agenda item 1, does the committee agree to take items 4 and 5 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
The next agenda item is to take evidence from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman. We are delighted to welcome Paul McFadden, the ombudsman; Andrew Crawford, head of improvement, standards and engagement; and Judy Saddler, head of investigations for public service complaints.
There is no need for you to deal with your microphones, as they will come on automatically. Mr McFadden, would you like to make a short opening statement?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
Thank you for your opening statement. A number of our members are attending the meeting online, as you can see, and they will join in and ask some questions.
You have talked about your priorities and given an overview of where you think you are. As you have worked in other parts of the United Kingdom, it would be good to hear whether you think that the office can learn from any of the processes in which you have been involved elsewhere. Is there scope within the organisation for development and perhaps more cohesion?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
As you identified, you need the resource to manage the increase. That might involve more staff or more financial input, so where do you see that coming into the budget process that you have to deal with?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
As previously agreed, we will take our remaining business in private.
10:33 Meeting continued in private until 11:11.Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
Stephen, in your opening remarks, you talked about funding gaps and a demand-led budget and service. Around £320 million more is likely to be spent on ADP than the Scottish Government receives in PIP block grant adjustment. You have touched on that this morning. We have also touched on the likelihood of the forecast gap of £770 million being closer to £400 million by 2029-30. It would be good to get a flavour of Audit Scotland’s conclusions on how the Scottish Government is managing the funding gap. You have given us a flavour of when you look at the figures and how you manage that, but it is a considerable sum of money and it is probably going to continue to grow.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
Good morning, Edel. The independent review reported clients’ positive views on consultations. Would greater use of consultations improve decision making? Are poor experiences of PIP assessments preventing the use of what could be a useful part of the decision-making process?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
The idea about the process being personalised comes out quite strongly in the review, which found that people wanted more personalised and accessible communication from Social Security Scotland. They saw that as an advantage. How important is that for people and how can it be achieved? That is a goal, but it is also something that Social Security Scotland is attempting to do.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
It is important to note that the Scottish Government’s choices, criteria and policy decisions are encouraging more people to come forward. There is no doubt about that, which must have a knock-on effect on how much this will cost. If people feel that dignity, respect and fairness are there, more will take up the opportunity to apply, as the system might not be seen as being as draconian or strict as it used to be. They might not have chosen to come forward in the past due to stigma and difficulties. The Government must take that into account and come to a conclusion about how this should be progressed and managed.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
It might appear that, when councillors put some pressure on council officers or when there is a bit of tension, the officers feel that they need to rein in the councillors in some way and the code of conduct is a way of doing that.
I think back even to my time as a councillor, although I have been out of it now for 10 years. The code of conduct was used against me occasionally to say, “You know, if you do that, then we might have to go down that route”. When a councillor is trying to find out information about specifics, there has to be trust between them and the official, and if that trust breaks down in any way, the code could be used as a weapon.
Do you think that is the case? Is the code being used in some ways to stymie, stop or manage some actions or behaviours? Or is it just something for the official who thinks, “I am the professional in this process and you have a justification to inquire, but if you overstretch the mark, then my professionalism could be compromised”?
It would be good to know because the complaints are increasing. There is a tension between councillors and officials, with the councillor wanting or seeking information and the official feeling, “I can give you so much” or “I have to adhere to some levels”. The tension is obviously still there and, if there is a problem and an increasing number of complaints, there must be some kind of structure behind it.