The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 694 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
Absolutely. You have indicated in your submission that there are no real concerns about the quality of the complaints handling service or the process. Assessing whether that is the case requires data, and you have also indicated that there is a lack of data when you are trying to analyse that. What data should be available to enable you to make a more informed assessment? That is where we want to try to get to. By having more data, you might then be able to assess how successful the service is or how the process is working. If there is a lack of data, you cannot really see whether the SPSO is fulfilling its role.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
In some ways, individual rights seem to be diminished. I put that to Jan Savage, given her role
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
You identify the opportunities that might arise; it is undoubtedly the case that a number of opportunities might arise. Whether there will be conflict in the future depends on where the risks are and where there is potential for divergence. In the past, we have heard about power grabs and things being done in a confrontational way. A problem could still potentially arise if there was such a difficulty, given the amount of red tape and bureaucracy involved, to which you referred.
As we look to improve the situation—you have identified that you believe that the new UK Government might want to be more aligned with the EU than the previous one—what progress do you think that we will see in the next 12 months or whatever?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
Good morning. You have all touched on the challenges that we have faced and that we continue to face in managing the processes for our sectors. Professor Portes, you touched on potential successes in how things have progressed. Are there specific areas and sectors in which there has been real change, with activity going from vibrant to non-existent, and are there others in which there was an acceptable level of activity and there are now further opportunities? We have heard that some organisations have relocated their offices to other locations to try to develop and expand some of their processes to ensure that they can tap into opportunities, whereas other organisations have not done that but have been reasonably successful. Do you believe that there is an opportunity to try to do that as we move forward? I ask Professor Portes to answer first.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
In your letter and your opening statement, you mentioned the “proportionate approach” that you are taking to EU alignment and the fact that you are not being complacent in guarding against any future risks. In that respect, it is vital that records are kept and information is shared, and our tracker report has identified some of that. What do you see those risks as being? Will you expand on some of the risks that we now face, in comparison with those that we thought that we might face when we started the process?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
New things.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
Minister, we are well aware of the organisations and structures that have issues with the scheme. One of the biggest is the Scottish Bed and Breakfast Association, which said that the scheme was
“by far the worst example of policy implementation”
that it has ever encountered. It saw it as “fragmented”, “inconsistent”, “arbitrary”, “onerous” and “costly”. Those are some of the areas that it has concerns about.
You talked about health and safety. Organisations such as the SBBA are compliant with health and safety rules already, with reference to inspection and enforcement. How do you respond to the SBBA’s analysis, which is relatively scathing about how the scheme has impacted its sector?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
We have touched on councillor-on-councillor complaints, and we know that they represent about 17 per cent of the total. The committee has been looking at barriers to elected office and we have heard that female councillors face much more hostility and toxicity in the council environment. It would be good to get a flavour of whether female councillors are submitting more complaints than male councillors. Have you seen such a trend? Do you want to express your views on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
Good morning, sir. It is good to see you again.
I am delighted to see strong financial management being talked about in relation to the organisation, but within that, there are cost implications and increases. We are now looking at £1.5 million of expenditure in 2023-24, compared with £1.04 million in the past. That is quite a significant increase of more than 50 per cent over the year. We know that your workload has increased and that you are required to get rid of the backlog, as we have discussed at other committees that I have sat on, but can you explain the reasons behind the rise in costs and provide assurances that the increase, once again, represents value for money to the taxpayer?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Alexander Stewart
Seen to be done.