The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 36 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee: Joint Committee
Meeting date: 24 November 2022
Alex Cole-Hamilton
I am grateful.
Despite some success in the recent implementation of the MAT standards, it is still proving difficult to access same-day services in rural areas, in which clinics are few and far between. What are your plans to increase the provision of same-day services in rural and harder-to-reach areas?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
I put the same question to Professor Dye.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Deputy First Minister, Murdo Fraser brought to our attention what I think is the most striking admission in the Government’s evidence paper, which was published last night—that Scotland, when it introduces vaccination certification, will be the only country in Europe to bring in such a scheme in isolation, without a requirement for testing. Murdo Fraser asked you about that, and I wrote down part of your answer. You said that the Government did not want to undermine vaccination uptake.
Do you have empirical evidence from other European countries that have brought in certification in tandem with testing requirements that suggests that vaccination uptake has been inhibited by that combination of measures?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
That seems slightly at odds with the messaging in the Government’s evidence paper, which was published last night.
In section 5.1, which is about the basis for the introduction of vaccination certification, the very first bullet point is about reducing transmission. Increasing vaccine uptake is ancillary to that—it is the fourth bullet point. I recognise that—
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
I am more than happy to concede on that.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Good morning, panel. I have just one question that I hope will be pretty straightforward.
Section 5.1 of the Government’s evidence paper, which was produced last night, states that the scheme first and foremost
“aims to ... Reduce the risk of transmission”.
Driving vaccine uptake is in fact ancillary to that, as it is the fourth bullet point. That chimes, I think, with the theme that the Government is trying to set out in its case, which is that Covid ID cards and vaccination certification are in and of themselves tools of infection control. When I asked the First Minister to respond to the fact that 5,000 cases occurred at an event that had required vaccination passports, she stated as indisputable fact that, without those passports, transmission would have been worse. As Professor Stephen Reicher is leaving, I will start with him. Do you think that that is fact? Would the situation at that event have been worse had there been no vaccination certification?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
I want to bring in Professor Drury, who has spoken extensively about behavioural science in this area. Given the significant coverage that vaccination already enjoys across the UK, is there a tipping point—I am thinking of an event such as the Boardmasters event in Cornwall, where there were 5,000 infections—at which the benefits of people evidencing their vaccinated status versus the risks of them dispensing with some of the precautions and indulging in riskier behaviour because of that means that it is more of a liability than an asset to ask for Covid certification?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Thank you, convener. I have no relevant interests.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Of course. I am happy to concede that point. My anxiety is that, as we have heard from eminent academics this morning, vaccination certification could drive down uptake in hesitant—or, rather, vaccine-sceptical—groups. If they feel browbeaten, they might not take up vaccination.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Thank you for that. My final area of questioning is about proportionality.
Last week, we heard from the Scottish Human Rights Commission that there is anxiety that the scheme will roll back our application of human rights, including statutory ones. Judith Robertson, the chair, made it clear that it is acceptable for states to do that in times of pressing need—obviously, coronavirus is a pressing need—but only if the scheme that is being introduced and the rollback of rights that goes with it can demonstrably impact on pushing down against that need. She also talked about proportionality, as did you.
My question is on the evidence of proportionality. Meeting the test that was set to us by the Scottish Human Rights Commission requires the Government to evidence that it has considered alternatives to the scheme. Are you satisfied that you have considered the use of testing as an alternative to vaccination certification to an extent that would satisfy the Scottish Human Rights Commission?