Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 17 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 36 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, Social Justice and Social Security Committee: Joint Committee

Reducing Drug Deaths in Scotland and Tackling Problem Drug Use

Meeting date: 24 November 2022

Alex Cole-Hamilton

I am grateful.

Despite some success in the recent implementation of the MAT standards, it is still proving difficult to access same-day services in rural areas, in which clinics are few and far between. What are your plans to increase the provision of same-day services in rural and harder-to-reach areas?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Vaccination Certification

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

I put the same question to Professor Dye.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

Deputy First Minister, Murdo Fraser brought to our attention what I think is the most striking admission in the Government’s evidence paper, which was published last night—that Scotland, when it introduces vaccination certification, will be the only country in Europe to bring in such a scheme in isolation, without a requirement for testing. Murdo Fraser asked you about that, and I wrote down part of your answer. You said that the Government did not want to undermine vaccination uptake.

Do you have empirical evidence from other European countries that have brought in certification in tandem with testing requirements that suggests that vaccination uptake has been inhibited by that combination of measures?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

That seems slightly at odds with the messaging in the Government’s evidence paper, which was published last night.

In section 5.1, which is about the basis for the introduction of vaccination certification, the very first bullet point is about reducing transmission. Increasing vaccine uptake is ancillary to that—it is the fourth bullet point. I recognise that—

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

I am more than happy to concede on that.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Vaccination Certification

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

Good morning, panel. I have just one question that I hope will be pretty straightforward.

Section 5.1 of the Government’s evidence paper, which was produced last night, states that the scheme first and foremost

“aims to ... Reduce the risk of transmission”.

Driving vaccine uptake is in fact ancillary to that, as it is the fourth bullet point. That chimes, I think, with the theme that the Government is trying to set out in its case, which is that Covid ID cards and vaccination certification are in and of themselves tools of infection control. When I asked the First Minister to respond to the fact that 5,000 cases occurred at an event that had required vaccination passports, she stated as indisputable fact that, without those passports, transmission would have been worse. As Professor Stephen Reicher is leaving, I will start with him. Do you think that that is fact? Would the situation at that event have been worse had there been no vaccination certification?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Vaccination Certification

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

I want to bring in Professor Drury, who has spoken extensively about behavioural science in this area. Given the significant coverage that vaccination already enjoys across the UK, is there a tipping point—I am thinking of an event such as the Boardmasters event in Cornwall, where there were 5,000 infections—at which the benefits of people evidencing their vaccinated status versus the risks of them dispensing with some of the precautions and indulging in riskier behaviour because of that means that it is more of a liability than an asset to ask for Covid certification?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

Thank you, convener. I have no relevant interests.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

Of course. I am happy to concede that point. My anxiety is that, as we have heard from eminent academics this morning, vaccination certification could drive down uptake in hesitant—or, rather, vaccine-sceptical—groups. If they feel browbeaten, they might not take up vaccination.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement

Meeting date: 30 September 2021

Alex Cole-Hamilton

Thank you for that. My final area of questioning is about proportionality.

Last week, we heard from the Scottish Human Rights Commission that there is anxiety that the scheme will roll back our application of human rights, including statutory ones. Judith Robertson, the chair, made it clear that it is acceptable for states to do that in times of pressing need—obviously, coronavirus is a pressing need—but only if the scheme that is being introduced and the rollback of rights that goes with it can demonstrably impact on pushing down against that need. She also talked about proportionality, as did you.

My question is on the evidence of proportionality. Meeting the test that was set to us by the Scottish Human Rights Commission requires the Government to evidence that it has considered alternatives to the scheme. Are you satisfied that you have considered the use of testing as an alternative to vaccination certification to an extent that would satisfy the Scottish Human Rights Commission?