The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 918 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Brian Whittle
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 June 2022
Brian Whittle
Thank you, convener.
I think that the cabinet secretary misses a huge point. As Pauline McNeill has alluded to, if you go into a court and watch court proceedings, you will find that it is normal for defence lawyers to walk into court and say that they need more time to prepare their case for their client. During Covid, they have been doing that multiple times and have been allowed to do so. All that I am asking for in my amendments is that we indicate to the court that the bar for extending the period has to be higher than that.
That would reduce the backlog that we so want to reduce. If we keep extending cases, as defence lawyers are allowed to do at the moment, the backlog will not be reduced. As I have said, victims of horrendous crimes are dropping out of proceedings, because of stress and mental health issues. My amendments are not about trying to reduce the capability of lawyers to defend or prosecute, but about making sure that there has to be a reason for extensions and that they are not just granted as a matter of course.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
I agree. My mantra has always been that we do not have an IT system that can collate and gather the data and give us the output that we need. Dr Holford wants to come in.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Briefly, Callum Hood has something to say.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Thank you. I could spend all day talking about data, its collection and how we utilise it.
For me, one of the difficulties with what happened, certainly within the UK, including in Scotland, was that we used the phrase “follow the science” a lot, without explaining what that means. Of course, the science changed and evolved as we began to understand more. How did Governments respond to that change, how were we able to communicate it, and did that compound the difficulty that we had in maintaining a line of communication?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Good morning to the panel. It is good to see you in person.
I will start with Mr Humpherson. I have long talked about the need to create systems that are not just a collection of data. Our ability to collaborate, communicate and use the data in the most effective way is not where it should be, not just in Scotland but in the rest of the UK. The pandemic has highlighted to a great degree that we need to do better. Where are we with that? What lessons have we learned? What actions have been taken to increase our background information technology system, which allows a colossal amount of data to be gathered and collated?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
It would be really interesting to get the two of you together, as two significant players in this area, to understand where the disconnect is.
I have one further small question, following on from my colleague John Mason’s question, about how television and radio put information across as the science evolves. Early in the pandemic, Jason Leitch and Nicola Sturgeon said that the evidence for masks was not there. Of course, as the science evolved, the evidence for masks was there. Early on, those working in the public health environment would be saying that we should be careful what we say to people, but things can completely change. Are you susceptible to a certain amount of criticism, especially around free speech, if you prevent people from saying something that becomes the reality a wee bit later on?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
I will be very quick.
Dr Phin, what impact did SARS and avian flu have on our thinking? I think that it was suspected that there could be 50,000 deaths from avian flu in the UK, but it turned out to be something like 464. Did that stat influence the way in which we approached this particular pandemic?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
Does anyone else want to come in on that question before I add a supplementary?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Brian Whittle
I thank the panel members for their time this morning.
As soon as information was put into the public domain, it seemed that other experts suddenly sprang up trying to say exactly the opposite. We seemed to collect a deluge of data. How far are we able to collate that data and communicate that in the public domain in a way that can easily be consumed? A lot of data was put on to websites such as the FACTS or NHS Inform websites, but I am not sure how many people actually visited those websites. Were Governments behind the curve in their ability to combat misinformation? Will Moy, could you answer that?