The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 995 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Brian Whittle
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Brian Whittle
You said that you are increasing the number of specialty training posts in Scotland. How will you ensure that that increase reflects the demand that will be there now that the bill has been introduced?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Brian Whittle
This petition is of considerable importance. Given that we do not have time to go into it in the depth that it requires, I think that it should be carried forward into the next session.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Brian Whittle
Good morning, Professor Smith. I was interested to hear you talk about the preventative agenda, which is something that is close to my heart. It has been much talked about in the time that I have been in the Parliament—I have talked about it the whole time—yet outcomes continually slide, so I am pleased to hear that it is at the top of your agenda.
What we have been doing so far has not worked. What is different now?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Brian Whittle
That points to what we were talking about before, Professor Smith, in relation to the prevention agenda. Surely it is obvious that serving the highest-quality food possible would benefit patients’ recuperation. As I said, 55 per cent of food is being thrown out because people are not eating it. That is a problem. The idea that we would build hospitals without kitchens is surely a false economy, as the best meals are prepared fresh on site. Is any consideration given to how and where we produce food, and the quality of the food that we deliver?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Brian Whittle
It is interesting that you talk about nutrition—that is one thing, but the food has to be edible. If 55 per cent of food is being thrown out, it might be because it is inedible despite having nutritional value.
I have a final question on the point that you made, Mr McLean, about the various models that exist across the country. Is there a problem in that respect? We have 14 different health boards that do things in 14 different ways, and they can each say no to a question, all of which means that it is difficult to deliver a universal approach.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 February 2026
Brian Whittle
I am not against having 14 different health boards, but do you accept that the lack of universality and the lack of a basic information technology infrastructure applied across all 14 boards are a drag on our ability to deliver on this agenda?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
I urge you to keep talking about that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
The only caveat that I would add to that is that the people who are currently voting members of the IJB are elected members, who are accountable to the public. If we give voting powers to other members, the scenario might not be the same. I know that the issue is not insurmountable, but there is a slight difference.
I will quickly ask one question that has occurred to me. Minister, you know that I am a big advocate of the third sector, of hearing the voice of the third sector and of the impact that the third sector can have on communities. We have a healthcare system that is already bloated. In my opinion, there are too many people in our healthcare system who can say no, and now we are looking at adding more people to committees. If your plan is to bring the third sector and commissioned services into that scenario and to give them a vote, why not reduce the number of voting members in the other two categories—the NHS and the council—to keep the numbers down? We seem to be adding more and more people into the system.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Brian Whittle
I do not know whether there is anything to add, because I know that we are really short of time. I have lots to talk about, but I will leave it there, given that we are so short of time.