The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 722 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Brian Whittle
I will not ask my next question, then.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
That is another one of my bugbears, but I do not want to go down that rabbit hole.
I hope that, if the bill was passed—albeit in an amended fashion—it would have a positive impact by enhancing health services and forcing us to bring in the third sector in a positive way. Delivering the bill would require all the services that you have set out. Do you not think that the bill has the potential to force Governments to properly fund and invest in the whole system? That is the only way that this could work. It is scary to say that, bad as our drug deaths are, the situation could be a lot worse for all the volunteers and third sector organisations in our areas that we all know about. Is it not the case that we need to force the issue?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
From listening to what you are saying, what seems to be lacking is a consistent relationship with a carer, healthcare professional or whatever. My worry is that there is a danger there. You are almost saying that, even if a medical professional thinks that the treatment that someone wants is not in the best interests of their health, they should have the right to try it.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
Good morning. I have a quick question. It has been said that the bill does not talk about the pre-treatment work that is important in trying to get people towards treatment. Would you agree, however, that if we get those people to make the hard and brave decision to seek treatment and then they do not get it, that is incredibly destructive to that person?
The bill is explicit that, if someone asks for treatment, they have the right to get it. Is that not important? I worry about people who may seek treatment and then not get it and about where that leaves them. It would leave them in a much worse place.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
My point is that that is what is happening just now. All the funding comes through statutory services before it gets to the third sector, and it is not getting passed on. We need to reverse that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
On that note, I shall leave it there.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
I will go back to the line of questioning that I was supposed to be on.
I will start on funding and resource allocation with a basic question about additional costs that are not accounted for in the financial memorandum that might arise from the bill’s implementation. Do you see that being an issue?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
I want to touch on one point following Sandesh Gulhane’s question, because I do not think that what was said about requesting a treatment is quite correct. Surely, when you request a treatment, the medical professional will suggest the most beneficial treatment for you, even though it might not be the treatment that you want. Am I getting that wrong? The way that the suggestion was framed was that someone would request a treatment and that was the treatment that they should get. Surely what is important is the medical professional’s opinion, as well as the discussion with the patient. Am I getting that right?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
We have heard a lot of evidence on the issue of co-ordinating drug treatments with housing, trauma treatment and social care. Do you think that the bill will help to promote that co-ordination by focusing our attention on how we cross those portfolios?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Brian Whittle
I will just throw in another question. How can the bill put emphasis on supporting a longer-term recovery beyond that initial treatment?