The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 774 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
That works only if palliative care is available.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I do not think that anybody is arguing that we cannot do anything until palliative care is perfect, but people have been saying that there needs to be access to palliative care. That is the concern.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I was not suggesting for one second that morphine is being administered specifically to end somebody’s life. You are saying that it would not be a contributing factor, because there is a balance between pain and the concern about the level of dosage. That is all that I was suggesting.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Thank you. My concern is that, under the current system, the products are reviewed every 10 years. You say that it is resource intensive to do that, which indicates to me that, over the 10-year period, the products are not being continually reviewed. If they had been, the process at the end of 10 years would not be so arduous. You are now suggesting that we move to a system where the products are continually reviewed, which would be intensive. If that is the case, I go back to my concern around the resource for FSS.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Good morning, panel members.
I have been exploring the issue of access to palliative care, which the bill has raised, along with the fact that many people do not get the access to the palliative care that they need. The flipside is that some people receive the highest level of palliative care, yet they get to a point where the care that they receive does not alleviate their physical or psychological pain. If assisted dying is not an option, what would be available to those people?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I move to what I was actually going to ask questions about: the concern that a lack of access to palliative care would push more people towards assisted dying. I have to be honest that that is one of my concerns. Too many people in our society do not have access to the palliative care that would give them comfort towards the end of life. Do witnesses want to comment on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I want to clarify a point about advance directives. Am I correct in understanding that you are saying that the problem with advance directives is that, when someone gets to a certain stage in relation to capacity, it is very difficult to understand whether they might have changed their mind on that journey? Are you saying that that is an inherent issue with advance directives, or am I misconstruing you?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
I am listening to the witnesses—you are obviously very passionate in your views, Tressa. However, I am wondering whether your comments are not so much about the bill but more about the way in which society—and Governments, potentially—currently treat disability and disabled people in terms of access to services. Would it be fair to say that it is more a comment on that, rather than specifically about the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Brian Whittle
Does that have the potential to influence somebody’s decision on whether to access assisted dying?