The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 336 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Annie Wells
Good morning, minister. In a response to one of the convener’s questions earlier, you spoke about the anticipated cost being just over £1 million. Do you envisage that changing at all? If so, what would you expect it to change because of?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Annie Wells
That was the only question that I had, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Annie Wells
Good morning. My first question is about the provisions on requesting information in section 6 of the bill. Can you confirm that the proposal on correspondence addresses is intended as a technical amendment to clarify the existing position that an email address is sufficient for a valid request to be made? How do you respond to the Scottish Government’s view that the current drafting may not make it clear enough that an electronic address alone is acceptable?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Annie Wells
The Scottish Government’s view is that the drafting might not make it sufficiently clear. Has the change made it clear enough, or does more work need to be done with the Scottish Government to make it clearer?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Annie Wells
Thank you for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Annie Wells
Thank you, convener, for clarifying that.
My second set of questions is about time for compliance and the “pause the clock” proposal. The Scottish Information Commissioner suggested an alternative model for the provisions on time for compliance in order to allow a short initial period of clarification requests, after which any delay would be deducted from the response time. Why did you decide not to adopt that approach, and what are your views on its merits or otherwise?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Annie Wells
Thank you very much for that clarification.
My final question is on the repeal of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (Time for Compliance) Regulations 2016 for grant-aided and independent special schools. Why do you believe that the 2016 regulations create inequalities for freedom of information rights?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Annie Wells
Thank you very much for that clarification.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Annie Wells
Yes. I could not agree with you more, David.
In your written submission, you noted that the process to bring registered social landlords within scope took 13 years and that the Scottish Government is due to consult on extending FOISA to cover care homes. Have you been invited to contribute to the scope or design of the upcoming consultation on care homes, and do you have any expectations or recommendations regarding the timescale for implementation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Annie Wells
My final questions are about section 2. Section 2(1) of the bill would require that Scottish ministers consider recommendations from the Scottish Information Commissioner on designating new bodies as public authorities under FOISA.
Would the Government like to expand on the concerns outlined in its memorandum regarding the provision in section 2(2) that would give Parliament the power to designate organisations as public authorities under FOISA?
Does the Government wish to clarify whether it believes that those provisions should be amended or removed from the bill?