The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7503 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Amendment 11, in the name of Mercedes Villalba, is grouped with amendments 13, 78 to 88, 158 to 164, 304, 304A and 304B. Amendments 304A and 304B are direct alternatives, which means that both can be moved and decided on. The text of whichever is last to be agreed to is what will appear in the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I wonder whether the member appreciates that deer fencing is not selective and that it is equally important for the establishment of new native woodland and the protection of non-spruce species. In other words, it is equally important to native woodland as to commercial conifer planting.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The question is, that amendment 284 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
There will be a division.
For
Carson, Finlay (Galloway and West Dumfries) (Con)
Eagle, Tim (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Against
Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Ruskell, Mark (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Tweed, Evelyn (Stirling) (SNP)
Wishart, Beatrice (Shetland Islands) (LD)
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 285 disagreed to.
Amendment 286 moved—[Rachael Hamilton].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
I would like to intervene. I am finding it difficult to understand how we can avoid potential conflict. For example, there might be multiple land users, and one land manager decides to have a land management plan that requires a very low density of deer. If that land management plan is accepted, do all the surrounding landowners have to control their deer as a result? Who decides, before enforcement comes in, whether that land management plan is reasonable? It is all very well to say that we can sit round the table, but, if one land management plan suggests that the maximum density is one deer per hectare, based on restoring some type of habitat, who decides whether that is reasonable or whether the impact on adjacent landowners is reasonable?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
Is “voluntary control scheme” not a bit of an oxymoron? The word “control” says it all. There will be points where the voluntary part of it disappears and it is about control. My question is along similar lines to Mark Ruskell’s: what safeguards are there when those controls, rather than voluntary methods, come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Finlay Carson
It is my understanding that the app that you referred to is a pilot. Is it your intention to bring it in across the whole country, and potentially mandate its use?