The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7503 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
Can you give an indication of the scale of the improvement? There were concerns that, given the number of sites that were being sampled and how long the process was taking, we did not have a proper view of what was happening. Can you give us an example of the scale of the improvement and an idea of the sort of figures that we are looking at?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
That could be a question for industry or the regulator.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
Did you want to continue, Ben?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
I call Ariane Burgess.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
I assure you that there was a desire for the committee—and, if I remember rightly, the previous Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee, in which I was involved—to do a piece of work on wild salmon, because we all appreciate that the pressures come from different places and, as the convener, I was keen to ensure that the focus was not on one aspect of the pressure. However, as I am sure you are aware, the committee has come under significant pressure to deal with other issues and pieces of legislation, so we could not do that this year. I am sure that, when we go on to discuss our legacy report at the end of the meeting, we will bear that in mind.
Before we move on to our final theme, which is on spatial planning, consenting and community benefit, I put on record my extreme disappointment that, although Highland Council and Shetland Islands Council, given how important their role is in the consenting of farms, were asked to take part in the round table to give a local authority perspective, neither sent any representatives. That, unfortunately, is a bit of a gap in the evidence that we could have taken today.
I invite Beatrice Wishart to ask her question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
I will go back to my initial question. I appreciate Neil Purvis’s response, which was that the data that he receives is sufficient for him to carry out his job. However, one of the issues that was clearly stated in the report’s recommendations was the level of public confidence, and I have not received an explanation of why collecting additional data would be burdensome. Witnesses have said that they will look into it, but the response that we have had from the Scottish Government and Salmon Scotland is that it would be burdensome for producers.
When you collect the data, which might potentially be done as part of the new digital platform, why would it be burdensome for the figures to be recorded below the 10 per cent or 5 per cent threshold, whichever is set?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
Our next item of business is consideration of a negative instrument. As members do not wish to make any comment on the instrument, are we content with it?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
Where there is a challenge in deciding what is acceptable, there is also a challenge in deciding what is not acceptable.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
We have allocated around two hours for this session, and we have quite a few questions to get through. I therefore ask that questions and answers be as succinct as possible.
I will kick off. One of our committee’s recommendations was that the Scottish Government should publish comprehensive, consistent and transparent mortality figures that include the number of fish at a farm and freshwater mortality and seawater mortality per facility, with accurate numbers of dead salmon, wrasse and lumpsuckers per week, and with cumulative mortality totals at the end of each cycle.
We felt that that was a proportionate recommendation. I was therefore disappointed that Salmon Scotland suggested that it would add regulation, bureaucracy, cost and complexity. The Scottish Government also stated that mandatory reporting of mortality would
“represent significant burden for producers and regulators”
that would not be
“balanced by a sufficiently high benefit.”
However, we regularly hear from campaigners about mortalities on fish farms and whether they are being accurately recorded.
For farms that already record mortalities on a daily basis, why would recording all mortalities, rather than those over a certain threshold, be burdensome or make their operations more complex?
Who would like to kick off?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Finlay Carson
Are all members content to recommend approval of the instrument?
Members: No.