The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7503 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I am conscious of the time. Do you have a further point to make, Ariane?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We will move to questions from Tim Eagle.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We will continue with our scrutiny of the draft climate change plan by hearing from a panel of forestry practitioners. I welcome Stuart Goodall, chief executive of Confor; Jo Ellis, head of planning and environment at Forestry and Land Scotland; David Robertson, director of investment and business development at Scottish Woodlands; and Willie McGhee, a board member of the Community Woodlands Association.
Before we move to questions, I remind members and witnesses to be succinct in their questions and answers. You do not have to operate your microphones; broadcasting will do that for you.
I will kick off with two fairly straightforward questions. How feasible are the annual planting targets in the draft CCP? Is the Climate Change Committee’s higher target of 22,000 hectares per year by the mid-2030s feasible? Who would like to kick off on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
On that point, the draft plan estimates a £2 billion economic value of non-market benefits annually across the forest estate. Who is likely to see that financial benefit?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I do not think that it does. The draft plan estimates an economic benefit of £2.1 billion to 2040, plus £2 billion economic value of non-market benefits. If figures are put in a plan, we have to have some indication of where they come from, because they justify the expenditure. That £2 billion is not timber product, but the non-market benefits.
11:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Hanna Wheatley, who will have a view on the matter.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
What are your estimates, and what do you base them on? How many hectares of trees are likely to regenerate naturally if we take appropriate action to achieve the climate change benefits? What is your estimate of how much land would be needed to deliver that, if we were to reduce planting?
12:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Who would like to kick off on that? Emily Taylor and Peter Hutchinson are both nodding vigorously.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We have a question from Tim Eagle on the back of that. You have perhaps covered some of the response already, but I think it is still worth his asking the question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I remember the joy on Roseanna Cunningham’s face when peatland restoration was awarded significant sums in the budget. At that point, there were concerns about whether that money could be spent. We are now at a stage of not having reached those targets. Although there has been commendable progress, as Peter Hutchinson mentioned, the targets have not been met.
We are always being told that we need to do more, and to do it quicker, because the scale of the problem will be larger in the future if we do not. However, in the CCP, there is actually a reduction in the pace of peatland restoration. I know that we always call for things to be more pragmatic, practically deliverable and feasible, but is it acceptable that, years on from the setting of the first peatland restoration targets—which have not been met—there is now a slowdown in the ambition to restore peatland?