The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5488 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
We are lucky to have two experts from the James Hutton Institute with us, so I will bring in Rob Brooker at this point.
From knowledge gained, as I have said, many years ago in the soil science department of Aberdeen University, I know that microbiology plays a huge role in this matter. The more artificial nitrogen we use, the less we rely on the microbes in the soil to fix It; in other words, microbiological and other matter in the soil is very good at allowing plants to take up nutrients, and the more artificial fertiliser we use, the less we rely on those microbes. As a result, reducing the use of artificial fertiliser has the regenerative effect of allowing these microbes to do their job again, and there is a tipping point at which the return on investment in terms of yield through the use of artificial fertiliser reduces. You do not get as big a bang for your buck, so to speak.
If that is correct, should the science be helping farmers with the decision to reduce their use of nitrogen and artificial fertilisers, given that, after a period, productivity that might have fallen will increase as the microbes in the soil start to do their job again? Again, this brings us back to the transition issue, but does part of the solution lie in knowledge transfer from you guys—the scientists—to grass-roots farmers to persuade them that doing things differently will not, in the long term, affect their bottom line and economic sustainability?
I am just seeing whether anyone is nodding. Would Pete Smith like to respond to that? [Interruption.] I beg your pardon—I had said that Rob Brooker would respond.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Do you want to comment, Pete?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
No, just ask your supplementary question just now. Thanks.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Jim Fairlie has a supplementary question.
11:30Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
We will move on to questions on the purpose, scope and content of the bill.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
There was a suggestion in some consultation feedback that we should refer not to private business but to enterprise. Was there any consideration of including large-scale private sector business enterprises in the bill?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Thank you. We will move to questions. Mr Burgess, I understand that you will field the questions and direct them to the appropriate official. I appreciate that.
I will kick off with a question on the pre-legislative consultation. As you said, the good food nation policy has been in development since 2009. In 2017, the Scottish food commission made recommendations on a bill and on other aspects of food policy, then issues were raised in the consultation on the bill. Among the issues were whether the bill would deal with public health, food insecurity, provenance and local procurement of food, food waste and food education. To what extent have those recommendations been included in the bill? If they have not been included, why have they not?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Should the Parliament not play a role in deciding what those functions are, to ensure that its concerns are addressed, rather than leave it to the Government’s discretion to decide which functions will fall under the requirement of paying due regard to the good food nation plans? I know that lists are dangerous because, often, it is not what is included in a list but what is not included in it that is important. We have provision for secondary legislation that might address that at some point, but is there not an argument for the bill specifying some of those functions rather than waiting for secondary legislation? When is it likely that secondary legislation will be introduced on that?
The Parliament might decide that the nutrition of elderly people is important and that we want it to be a principle of the Good Food Nation (Scotland) Bill that is always referred to when anything emerges that might have an impact on it, but the Government might not suggest that as one of its specified functions. Why is there not an opportunity for the specified functions to be laid out in the primary legislation and, potentially, added to in the secondary legislation?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Although we understand that legislation is required to necessitate public bodies to produce a plan, it is not required for the Government to publish a plan. Are there practical implications in that regard? Does that potentially change the purpose of the bill?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 3 November 2021
Finlay Carson
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the ninth meeting in session 6 of the Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee. I remind members who are using electronic devices to switch them to silent mode.
Our first item of business is an evidence session on the Good Food Nation (Scotland) Bill with Scottish Government officials. I welcome George Burgess, who is the deputy director in food and drink; Ashley Cooke, who is the head of food policy; James Hamilton, who is a solicitor; and Tracy McCollin, who is the head of the bill team.
I invite George Burgess to make some opening remarks.