The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Emma Harper has a supplementary question, and then we will hear from Mark Ruskell.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
If it is the case that national parks are performing as well as the Government believes that they are and that they are delivering what the Government believes that they have been set out to deliver, why was all that information allowed to influence the decision of the people in Galloway?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Okay. As we have no further questions, that concludes our evidence session. I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for their time this morning.
10:39 Meeting continued in private until 11:36.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Welcome back. Our third agenda item is an evidence session with the cabinet secretary regarding the decision not to proceed with plans to designate a Galloway and Ayrshire national park. I again welcome Mairi Gougeon, the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands, and her officials.
We have allocated around an hour for this item of business, and I invite the cabinet secretary to make a short opening statement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. Emma Harper will kick off.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
I really struggle with lists, because—you touched on this yourself—we create a list and the focus is then on what is not on the list. From what you are saying, it appears that the objectives in paragraphs (a) to (f) in proposed new section 1(2) are all a bit woolly and that we can fit anything into them. Nowhere does it mention housing, but we hear from the Cairngorms and the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs stakeholders that housing is absolutely key. When we heard evidence on the proposed Galloway national park, one of the concerns was about the cost of housing.
You could fit housing into the bill—you could squeeze it into paragraph (e). However, there is no specific mention of it. Is there any point in having these objectives if you can squeeze anything you like into them? It may well be housing, jobs that pay the living wage or whatever. All of those things are important, but are they really the main aims of the national parks? Would it be better to get rid of the list altogether?
My follow-on point from that is whether there is a priority. We have previously heard that there is not a priority and that all the aims are important. However, they ultimately all go back to paragraph (a):
“restoring and regenerating biodiversity in the area”.
That is the overriding and most important aim of a national park. Are the aims set in a criterion that says, for example, that paragraph (a) is more important than paragraph (d) or that paragraph (e) is more important than paragraph (f)? Is there a chance that planners will use the list to prioritise allowing, disallowing or encouraging certain activities and not others?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Are you open to considering amendments that would add to that list, to address some of the specific issues around, for example, housing or jobs that pay the living wage in the national park? Again, there is scant reference to those who live in the national park. Rhoda Grant previously mentioned visitors and tourism, and there is not a lot in the bill about protecting those who live in a national park. Does that need to be expanded on?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the 20th meeting of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee in 2025. Before we begin, I ask everyone to ensure that electronic devices are switched to silent.
Our first item of business is consideration of whether to take item 4 in private. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Yes. Ultimately, the decision of the people in Galloway appeared to be based on the idea that national parks are not delivering and that they are actually curtailing the ability for areas to be economically sustainable. Again, the view was that national parks just exacerbate problems with the low-wage economy, low-skilled jobs, higher house prices and restrictions on agriculture. If that is not the case, why did that misinformation effectively succeed in persuading the majority of people in Galloway not to back a national park?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
There has been some concern about what the definition of cultural development is. Some have suggested that you should have considered alternative words such as “creative” or “creative arts”. Was there a reason, or much discussion around, why the term “cultural development” was used?