The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5549 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
That was really interesting, Dr Needle, but the crux of the matter is whether you have any evidence that the sustainability of the cod stock in the Clyde is being affected by the lack of spawning. Is there more of a lack of spawning now than there was previously? Do you have any evidence to suggest that there are fewer eggs and less spawning by cod?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
But there is no evidence that that is the case.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
We will move on to look at the impact of closure.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
I am interested to hear how many cod fishermen there are in the Clyde.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
Should fishermen be considered in a different way from oil workers or farmers when they are trying to do their best for the just transition?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
Before you answer that, cabinet secretary, I ask that we try to stick to the cod box issue, which is what we are discussing today, rather than spreading things a little bit wider, given the time constraints.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
That opens up some questions about what additional science-based evidence was introduced between order number 1 and order number 2.
Jim Fairlie would like to ask a final and very short question, and then we will need to move on.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
Okay. Cabinet secretary, I thank you and your officials for staying with us for this extended period. We really appreciate it. As you can understand, there are a lot of questions to be asked.
Agenda item 2 relates to motion S6M-03543, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, which asks the committee to agree to recommend that the instrument be annulled.
I invite Rachael Hamilton to set out her reasons for lodging the motion. The cabinet secretary will have an opportunity to comment and can bring in her officials as necessary. We will debate the motion formally at item 3.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
As no member of the committee wishes to ask Rachael Hamilton any questions, I turn to the cabinet secretary.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Finlay Carson
As the cabinet secretary has admitted, the process has been flawed from the start, and I believe that it is still flawed at the finish. The unprecedented numbers of responses about the first order that was laid, and the subsequent very short timescale before the second order was laid, are of concern, and there is a lack of transparency over what factors contributed to the orders being changed. We have heard of concerns about scientific evidence, data collection and monitoring, a lack of appreciation of the impact of the closures on socioeconomic aspects and environmental safety, and proportionality. One fisherman suggested that the comment about a short-term economic impact on local fishers showed an “almost flippant attitude”.
I have concerns that, given the new Bute house agreement, this will not be the last order of this type that we see in front of us. On that basis, there needs to be some recognition that, along with other sectors, whether that is oil and gas, transport or farming, a transition to a more sustainable way of fishing needs to be compensated for or supported in some way. There is a complete lack of appreciation of the impact on fishers as they try to do the best thing, which is to create sustainable fisheries. On that basis, I will support the motion to annul.
11:15