The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7503 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
I again want to pick you up on your assertion that you are maintaining the basic payment scheme. You are not. The basic payment scheme has been cut by £64.5 million in real terms, out of a pot of £282 million. That is a 23 per cent cut to the basic payment in five years, so it has not been maintained. There have been year-on-year cuts.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Thanks. I appreciate that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Okay. Alasdair Allan is next.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Does the total budget line reflect that additional money? Is that an additional £26 million that was put back in or is the budget just being kept the same? It is difficult to work out whether the money is really being returned.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Okay. Thank you.
My final question on the agricultural side of things is about the criticism that the budget has drawn from major stakeholders. NFU Scotland has warned that the budget
“essentially flatlines vital … support payments”
and that it will result in a real-terms decline. It criticised the lack of multiyear funding and said that the budget consigns the industry
“to an annual battle for future support.”
Scottish Land & Estates said that businesses have been left with “little confidence”, while the Countryside Alliance said that it was disappointed that funding had been cut
“When every aspect of farming and land management costs more year on year”.
That does not sound positive.
In the light of the budget, do you have a positive message for farmers and land managers to show that the Government cares about rural Scotland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
Okay.
Confor has repeatedly said that the Government needs to reverse the significant reductions in previous budgets. It suggested that about £70 million is needed in 2026-27, which would have to rise to closer to £100 million by the end of the next parliamentary session. The current level of funding pays for the planting of only about 10,000 hectares, which is 2,000 hectares short of the target that needs to be met if we are to achieve our climate and nature objectives.
Why has the Government not listened to the forestry sector? Given the climate change plan, which is supposed to enable Scotland to achieve its climate and planting targets, why are we not seeing an increase in forestry funding to repair the damage that has been done to confidence and to give the industry confidence that it has a long-term future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
That takes us nicely on to the next question, which comes from Ariane Burgess.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
But was any assessment done of the impact on tourism assets or on public access to the national forest?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
As far as I recall, one of the criticisms of the marine directorate, when the committee held its short inquiry, was that there was a lack of transparency. I am not suggesting that that was deliberate, but it was not clear what funding was going into the marine directorate and where that was coming from.
The issue that we are discussing is an example of an area in which we cannot see some fundamental investment to allow the marine directorate to operate effectively, in a modern way. We are not sure where it sits within the Government budget or in which portfolio. I know that you said that it is capital spend, but it is difficult for us to drill down and see what investment and commitments the Scottish Government has made to the marine directorate.
As I said, if I remember correctly, that was one of the comments that we heard during the committee’s inquiry some time ago. That was about not just capital spend but some of the funding for revenue spend, staffing costs or whatever. There is a lack of transparency. I am not suggesting that that is deliberate, but you may need to reflect on that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Finlay Carson
We will now have some supplementary questions. I call Ariane Burgess.