The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5863 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
We are all aware that there are capacity issues in local authorities across Scotland, particularly in planning. Do you see any capacity issues for local authorities if we have a new tranche of targets for them to police and monitor? Do we need to be aware of that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I have a quick question. Where does affordable housing sit within the national park objectives? I do not see anything at all. Do the national park authorities have to be aware of the impact of the park on the market? The lack of affordable housing is controversial, because the narrative is that national parks create a housing market that means that locals are priced out. Affordable housing is not one of the aims and objectives of the national park, but it obviously features quite prominently in the Cairngorms. Why is that sitting within the national park plan when it is not one of the aims and objectives?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Will there be additional expectations for national park authorities to deliver when it comes to ensuring that they do everything that they can to meet future targets? Will there be gold-plated expectations for national parks? Will the expectations for Loch Lomond and the Trossachs and the Cairngorms national parks be higher than those for Argyll and Bute Council, for example?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Should we, as parliamentarians, look for the bill to include a clear indication of the requirement for public consultation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
That was just an example. The point could apply to any sort of infrastructure in a rural environment.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Mark Lodge, will local authorities that do not cover national parks be at a disadvantage in that, although they will have to make the same efforts to ensure that targets are met, they might not receive the funding that national parks receive?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I will ask a final question about part 1 of the bill. What are your expectations on consultation prior to the first set of targets being introduced? We are not quite sure about the timing of their introduction. I believe that a 12-month period is specified, but there is nothing that suggests that a public consultation will be required. From the perspectives of national parks and local authorities, what level of consultation should take place before the first targets are set?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
The national parks have a framework or template for consultation because they consult quite regularly. However, for local authorities, does the bill need to set out exactly how the Government should consult the public, or do they have a clear idea of how consultation should be carried out?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Finlay Carson
National parks were landscape designations, and they focused on biodiversity. What happens when it comes to renewables and plans for 210m turbines? This may not be about non-regression, but, if independent reporters suggest that an impact is unacceptable, should the Government be able to overrule them? Should the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill deal with that sort of impact? As far as I understand it, national parks do not have any wind farms but there will be times when they have to deal with applications for overhead power lines and so on. Given that there is a race to having ever more renewables in our rural landscape, if nothing is set out and if there are none of the safeguards that Grant Moir touched on, do we need to focus a bit more on scenarios where Government ministers can effectively overturn independent EIAs? My question, which may be for Mark Lodge as well, is whether there should be some sort of safeguard or an explanation of the pros and cons of an application being approved.