The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
What are the practical knock-on effects of that? I come to you again, Elspeth, then I will bring in Jimmy Buchan. Given that the agreement will stand until 2038, what is the situation going to look like in our coastal communities and our processing sector?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
From your perspective, Jimmy, with reference to security and confidence on the processing side, is the agreement going to have an impact on your sector?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
What role does the industry have in lobbying or working with the Scottish Government so that the Scottish Government makes the industry’s position clear on future trade agreements?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
One issue that came out above the rest concerned the timescale for organisations to come forward in the bidding process and the capacity within areas to produce successful bids. There is no legislation at all for that, so we may need to look at addressing that by using the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill to make amendments to the existing National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000.
In some areas, there appeared to be an overreliance on using volunteers to bring forward proposals. We heard in evidence that it took up to seven years to reach a consensus about how the national parks in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs and in the Cairngorms would be developed and that businesses, locals, individuals and non-governmental organisations came together to look at how they would see a national park being developed. However, in Galloway, that timescale was significantly shorter.
The main issue was that NatureScot played two separate and distinct roles, one of which was to make recommendations as a reporter to the consultation while the other was as the natural heritage adviser to the Scottish Government. That led to a lot of people suggesting that NatureScot was biased in its role as reporter in providing the Scottish Government with professional advice as well as trying to carry out an effective consultation. How did you weigh up that advice, considering NatureScot’s two roles? Would you consider again an amendment that would provide for an independent reporter to provide the consultation responses for future designations?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
We have heard that the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee recommended that there should be an independent review of national parks to inform future decisions. We heard that suggestion throughout the consultation, and you have touched on it yourself. There was misinformation around some of the challenges that the current national parks have. Would it not be sensible to have an independent review of national parks? We know that they have annual reviews, but, effectively, the park authorities mark their own homework. Although the Government has oversight of that process, there is a lack of confidence that the reports reflect the true situation in national parks. There are still questions about whether parks deliver on their nature targets and for local communities.
Would you consider an independent review? If one had been in place prior to the Galloway national park proposal, the arguments would not have been quite so polarised and there would not have been accusations that misinformation led people to their conclusions about whether there should be a new park.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Our second item of business is an evidence session with the Scottish Government as part of our consideration of the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. Today, we will take evidence on part 3 of the bill. I welcome Mairi Gougeon, the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands, and her officials from the Scottish Government: Nicola Bradley-Martin, a solicitor; Brittany Brown, the policy lead; Jenny Gibbons, team leader, national parks; and Felicity Hollands, deputy bill team leader.
We have allocated around an hour to discuss part 3 and, as usual, we have quite a few questions to get through, so I ask for succinct questions and answers.
I will kick off. What difference to national parks do you think that the amendments to the statutory purposes that are being suggested will make?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
The 2000 act says that one of the aims of a national park is to
“promote sustainable use of the natural resources of the area”,
but the bill talks about promoting the
“sustainable management and use of the area’s natural resources”.
What does that mean in practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. Rhoda Grant will ask the next questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
I know that Mark Ruskell and Emma Harper want to come in. I will bring in Elena Whitham first, then pick up supplementary questions.