The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
That was a rounded “no”. We are all in agreement, which is very unusual, especially when we have so many stakeholders with us.
Our witnesses have no other comments in response to Beatrice Wishart’s question, so that was nice and easy. We might get the same response to the next questions, which come from Elena Whitham.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
That was short and sweet. What about you, Peter?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
In your view, would it be better if we saw a draft code of practice prior to the conclusion of the bill process?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I will give Ross Ewing the right to reply. It must be short.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
David Fleetwood has a final comment on the topic.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I am aware that we are now getting second-time speakers on this first question. I have supplementary questions from a number of members as well, so I will bring in Emma Roddick with her supplementary question and I will go through the list again. Feel free to add to your comments if they were not covered previously.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
The public interest is currently undefined. What do you see as being the public interest?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you, Mr Mountain. For the first evidence session, I welcome to the meeting Donald Fraser, who is the head of wildlife management, and Robbie Kernahan, who is the director of green economy, both at NatureScot. We have approximately 60 minutes for the session. Before we move on, let me make you aware that you do not need to operate your microphones. We have a gentleman here who will do that for you.
I will kick off with the first question. Section 10 of the bill amends part 1 of the Deer (Scotland) Act 1996, which covers NatureScot’s deer functions. The bill updates the aims and purposes of deer management to include the public interest. Additionally, NatureScot should now take account of the environment when carrying out its functions. Will that change what NatureScot is already doing on the ground? How will it affect NatureScot’s resources and capacity?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
So, you are not considering starting to work on that so that we can give some reassurance to stakeholders and land managers at the moment.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Finlay Carson
I have a brief technical question about section 8. The bill suggests that a control scheme should be registered in respect of titles to the land. Should there be something in the bill to allow, in the event of the title changing hands, the control scheme to change back to a control agreement? Would that not be more reasonable, given that the new owners might be willing to put in place voluntary measures to control deer? Do we need to be aware of that?