The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
Just on the practicalities, I point out that the reporting deadline is 26 June, so today is our last opportunity to deal with the instrument.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
We have had it for 40 days.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
I will bring in David Lynn.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Jamie Whittle, who will be the final person to respond to the opening question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Robbie Kernahan to respond on why NatureScot thinks that an annual licence is appropriate.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
If licences were granted indefinitely, I presume that the bill would provide the ability for licence conditions to change without people having to make an application, if secondary legislation changed the licence requirements. Is that right?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
I understand that the CCC is reviewing its position on peatland. At the moment, there has not been a definite yes or no from the CCC. However, given that muirburn, which is carried out under the muirburn code, burns only the vegetation and not the peat, why are you suggesting that a depth of 30cm or 40cm is important? We heard from the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, I think, or it might have been Robbie Kernahan, that only 5 per cent of wildfires are on grouse moors. It is the wildfires that potentially burn peat.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
I will bring in Emma Hinchcliffe on that specific point before I come to Bruce Farquharson.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
I think that we are drifting away from the topic.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Finlay Carson
I echo Rachael Hamilton’s views. It is concerning that the NFUS has itself raised concerns. However, it believes that the proposed agriculture bill will “offer ... adequate provision” in that respect. I have to say that I am not aware of any draft agriculture bill or any provisions in it, but it would appear that the NFUS has had sight of the proposed bill to give it that comfort. It concerns me that we are potentially making a decision without knowing whether a forthcoming bill will mitigate the NFUS’s concerns.
Moreover, the policy note suggests that private intervention will cease to have effect in Scotland for a period of five years but no impact assessment has been made, because the provision is “for a temporary period”. I would have thought that five years is a fairly extended temporary period and that an impact assessment should have been carried out. Five years is a long time, and I am concerned that there is no more detail on that.
We could write to the Government today with those concerns. Are we otherwise content to agree to the instrument?