The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Given that the policy direction is to halt biodiversity decline by 2030, and we will probably not pass the bill until 2026—it will take perhaps another year to get secondary legislation in place—is reporting every three years appropriate? Should we be looking for interim reports or on-going reports? Given that we have a biodiversity crisis, is it reasonable to suggest that three years on would be too far in the future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Professor Tett, would you like to comment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
That leads us on nicely to a question from Elena Whitham.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
If it is brief, although Tim Eagle has a supplementary.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. I call Mercedes Villalba.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I will go round the table, because I am quite sure that you will all have something to say on this.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Should the bill reflect the capacity or the lack of it within some of the public bodies that need to be involved in the process? For example, Emma and others have touched on the current race for onshore as well as offshore renewables, but the capacity within local authorities to look at and review those environmental impact assessments is a massive issue. Some local authorities with the bulk of the wind farm applications have only a part-time biodiversity officer.
Should something within the bill ensure capacity within the whole chain of the EIA process to deal with it adequately? At the moment, local authorities are not able to deal with that process and applications are automatically passed to the energy consents unit to decide. That effectively bypasses some of the scrutiny and some of the local democracy. Do we need something in the bill that ensures that the process is fit for purpose and that there is capacity to deliver the right outcomes, particularly on planning applications?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
How realistic is that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I suppose that the process can work, but the evidence right now is that it does not, because a huge number of applications bypass a whole part of that scrutiny—the local authority part—and go straight to the energy consents unit, which nobody knows about. It is a secret department within the Government. It is incredibly difficult to find out how that decision-making process works. The EIA process might be there but, if we cannot deliver it, is it fit for purpose? That is my query.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Finlay Carson
This question might be one for Jamie. Does the bill need to address the inadequacies, the lack of resourcing and whatever? Again, I want to go back to local authorities. Often, the energy consents unit will put on obligations or planning conditions to address issues that are raised in an EIA, but the obligation to monitor whether the mitigations, monitoring or whatever have been put in place fall back on the local authority, which does not have the resources to do that.
Whether it is testing water quality or counting to make sure that a number of crested newts have been relocated or whatever, do we need a provision in the bill to ensure that any statutory obligations or constraints that are put on planning can be monitored and mitigated by—in many cases—the local authority?