The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5931 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Welcome back. We will go straight back to questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
The hot topic today is the ban on selling energy drinks to under-16-year-olds—that led the news today.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. I am conscious of the time, so we will move on. I call Evelyn Tweed.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. We will move on to our final question, which is from Emma Roddick.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Who would like to have a go at that? We will also take general comments about the way in which the consultation has been carried out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
You touched on the issue of budget. There is no dedicated budget to support the plan, the cost of which instead falls on other sectors. For example, we will be considering the rural support plan over the coming months and the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill will include an element of costs to deliver some of the plan’s outcomes. Is that a failing? Does it suggest that there is no real commitment to, or understanding of, what will be required to deliver the vision for a good food nation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
We are making good progress. I suggest that we take a five-minute comfort break before coming back to the last few questions.
11:19 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. At the very start of the meeting, we touched on conflict between different outcomes. Do you think that, when it comes to scrutiny of other legislation, such as that for the climate change plan and future agriculture policy, we will find some sort of hierarchy? Where will the good food nation plan sit in that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Part of my thinking is that we have arable production in Scotland that is incredibly important not only to specific parts of the country but for exports of Scotch whisky, for example, given our significant grain production. As you touched on, there will be a difficulty in that regard. Some of that land could be used for producing vegetables or whatever, but if we do not have the tax take from that, there will be a significant impact on the budget to deliver on other priorities. It is quite difficult.
Lisa Hislop-Smith, do you want to come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Finlay Carson
I certainly think that we need to put all this into context: it has taken two decades from this being first mentioned to our getting the first local public body plan, so it has been a long time in the making. As you have said, though, the last stages might have been slightly rushed. Certainly from the committee’s point of view, it is unfortunate that the plan’s parliamentary scrutiny was not set out in legislation, because it means that the committee has no official role in dealing with it. In fact, there is no legislative necessity for the Parliament to oversee the plan at all.
I will bring in Lisa Hislop-Smith and then Vicki Swales.