The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5898 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Finlay Carson
Okay. Thank you. I call Ariane Burgess.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Finlay Carson
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Finlay Carson
Cabinet secretary, Stuart Goodall from Confor congratulated the Government on its targets to increase woodland creation, but the amount of woodland that has been created has fallen over the past five years. We are now looking at a massive cut of more than £32 million to Scottish Forestry’s grant budget, which, in the words of Stuart Goodall,
“will only serve to make the gap between targets and delivery ever wider. A bad situation will become worse.”
He goes on to say:
“A cut of the scale proposed will lead to job losses in struggling rural areas, destruction of millions of young trees and a blow to sector confidence that will take a long time to recover.”
Why on earth is there such a massive cut to that budget? Will the Scottish Government be able to meet its forestry ambitions?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Finlay Carson
Our final question comes from Rhoda Grant.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Finlay Carson
Our second item of business is consideration of three negative Scottish statutory instruments Do members wish to make any comments on the instruments?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
Finlay Carson
Thank you. You have tried to put a positive slant on your budget, but it is a disaster. You sit on the Cabinet and lobby, I presume, for funding for the agricultural sector, but you have failed. We have a 9.3 per cent reduction in the agri budget, the biggest reduction of any portfolio, which is astounding given that agriculture is expected to deliver on biodiversity loss and climate change. Where has it all gone wrong?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 January 2024
Finlay Carson
I had a resolution to be positive in the new year. Sadly—this is no reflection on the fantastic evidence from our witnesses today—when I look at the strategy, I find it as depressing as a Christmas turkey on boxing day. It really has no meat on the bones whatsoever, and that worries me.
We hear Màiri McAllan talk daily about the nature crisis and how we need to go faster and further, but the strategy does not do any of that. You have really struggled to touch on the strategy’s positives, while the negatives—what is not in the strategy—are staring us in the face. One of the positives that is mentioned relates to non-native invasive species. However, I have been in the Scottish Parliament since 2016 and we have been talking about it for the past eight years, yet you are still saying that you need more detail.
On river catchment policies, we have a land use strategy that has sat on the shelf for goodness knows how many years. Moreover, we are at the business end of the agriculture bill, but, even though it is supposed to be a joint effort, one organisation is saying that 80 per cent of funding should be in tier 1 of the support package while another is saying that only 25 per cent should be. We are only weeks away from putting in place those laws, yet we are still not there.
I am disappointed to hear that people felt that there was no realistic engagement on the plan, because we need to be able to communicate the significant impacts of the policies that we will need to meet the huge task of reversing biodiversity loss. Again, though, we are still not there.
Has there been genuine co-production of the strategy, given some of the issues that you have raised? As Sarah Cowie has said, it will empower farmers and people to accelerate biodiversity restoration, but it appears that we are not there at the moment. The 17.6 per cent cut in the agri-environment budget does not send a very good signal to farmers that their work is valued or, indeed, that biodiversity should play a huge role in future food production. Has there been genuine co-production, or do we need to do a lot more to get a far better joined-up approach to biodiversity?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Finlay Carson
The code of practice could be very important for cross-compliance or for payments. What level of scrutiny should it be subject to? Your submission to the committee suggested that the rural support plan should have oversight, although not from the agriculture reform implementation oversight board. You did not say why ARIOB should not do it, but you said that it should not. Should the code of practice be subject to the same sort of scrutiny by an oversight body, given the code’s potential to form the basis of cross-compliance for any other payments?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Finlay Carson
Before I bring in Vicki Swales, Alasdair Allan has an additional supplementary for some clarification.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 20 December 2023
Finlay Carson
Okay. Rachael has a point of clarification.