The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5863 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. I welcome to the meeting Ivan McKee, the Minister for Public Finance, and Joseph Triscott, who is the aquaculture development policy lead in the Scottish Government. I ask Ivan McKee to make an opening statement; we will then ask questions of the policy lead.
Sorry, minister—there is no sound.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
I have a question for Chris Tuckett. Will the EIA provisions that this bill will deliver, if it goes through, be compatible with the direction of travel on environmental outcomes in England? Will we have issues further down the road? We are seeing increasing examples of mitigation measures being put in place elsewhere in the United Kingdom to offset offshore wind farms down south. For example, south-west Scotland has been chosen as the site to mitigate the potential impact on Sandwich terns in Norfolk. Will we have issues in the future if the approaches to EIAs and environmental outcomes diverge?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Rhoda Grant has a supplementary question, and then she will ask her next set of questions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Rhoda Grant, did you want to come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
No one else wants to respond, so I will bring in Mercedes Villalba.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Excellent. That is good to hear.
We will move on to part 3, which is on national parks. Emma Harper has a question on that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
The next item on the agenda is our final evidence session on the Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill. I welcome Maurice Golden, who is the member in charge of the bill; he is supported by parliamentary officials. We have around 90 minutes for the session.
I will kick off with a nice straightforward question. Mr Golden, you have based a lot of the bill’s provisions on the UK Pet Abduction Act 2024, but, given that it was introduced only last summer, no substantive research has yet been carried out on the act’s effectiveness. Can you advise the committee why you decided to introduce your bill at this stage rather than wait until there was evidence on the success, or otherwise, of the 2024 act?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
The next question is from Emma Roddick, who joins us online.
As we cannot connect to Emma, we will move on and come back to her if we can get her online.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
We will try again to bring in Emma Roddick. Can you hear us now, Emma?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Finlay Carson
Would it create an issue whereby a person would be allowed to provide an impact statement in relation to dog theft, but the same thing would not happen in any other case that was not a solemn case?