The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6190 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
One of the statements that you just made illustrated the issue that we have. You quoted the mortality of X million fish, but you did not contextualise that or provide any information about whether that is proportionate or acceptable. We continue to hear that message. We are not sure whether 1.5 million fish dying is reasonable or can be accepted. Understanding the context is one of the issues that the committee has. For example, a 1 per cent mortality, or more than that, in a beef herd might be significant, but a 5 per cent mortality in the aquaculture industry might not be significant compared with other types of farming. With situations like that, does the public get enough information to make educated decisions on whether aquaculture is making progress?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
Thank you. That is a good place to start. I move to a question from Ariane Burgess.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
To conclude this section, I want to put it into perspective. As a former farmer, I remember that we used to inject our calves with selenium to give their immunity a little boost. We used to give them an infectious bovine rhinotracheitis injection, or they would get bovine viral diarrhoea, and, on the back of that, there was quite a high use of antibiotics. We were treating conditions that were the result of various infections. Over time, however, the livestock industry has reduced the use of antibiotics quite significantly—for instance, as a prophylactic treatment for dry cows with mastitis. We have seen a dramatic drop in the use of antibiotics in other types of farming and food production. Are we seeing the same progress in aquaculture?
This inquiry and the report that we will be doing are all about progress and whether we are making progress. In agriculture, the advances in the area of inoculations and vaccinations have had the knock-on effect of reducing the use of antibiotics. Are we seeing the right direction of travel in aquaculture? Are we on the right path to reducing the use of antibiotics—not Ivermectin, which is a wormer for cattle, but the one that is used for fish? Are we seeing progress leading to the reduction in the use of these types of chemicals?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
We will now hear from our second panel of witnesses, which is made up of aquaculture scientists. I welcome to the meeting Professor Simon MacKenzie, who is head of the institute of aquaculture at the University of Stirling; Professor Sam Martin, who is the director of research in the school of biological sciences at the University of Aberdeen; and Dr Helena Reinardy, who is a lecturer and teaching fellow at the Scottish Association for Marine Science. Joining us remotely are Dr Annette Boerlage, who is a research fellow in aquatic epidemiology in the school of veterinary medicine at Scotland’s Rural College, and Professor Lynne Sneddon, who is the chair in zoophysiology in the department of biology and environmental sciences at the University of Gothenburg.
I am glad that I got my lips around all of that. We have approximately 90 minutes of questions, and I will kick off with a fairly straightforward one.
The Scottish Science Advisory Council’s report on the use of science and evidence in aquaculture concluded that science on aquaculture is “not sufficiently visible”. Do you consider public understanding of the salmon farming industry to be based on reliable information?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
There is a public perception of aquaculture, and views on it can be quite polarised, as are so many topics these days. Is the public understanding based on accurate and reliable information? The job of the committee in the piece of work that we are doing is to see whether there has been progress in the past five years. It is important that we base our decisions on accurate information. Professor MacKenzie, is the information that the public have reliable and sufficient for them to make up their minds on aquaculture?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
We are looking at environmental impacts. If you do not have a question, I have one and then we can move on to the next one.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
Who is keen to respond?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
Okay—that is helpful.
One of the report’s recommendations was for
“coordination with the data ... and comprehensive overview of all fish health, welfare and treatment issues across the sector”.
Have we made improvements over the past five years to ensure that there is co-ordination of fish health data? Is it better than it was five years ago?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Finlay Carson
The response to that might be very similar to the response to my question, unfortunately. If nobody feels that they can offer a view on the interaction between wild and farmed salmon, we will leave it there.