The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7545 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
We have heard that the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee recommended that there should be an independent review of national parks to inform future decisions. We heard that suggestion throughout the consultation, and you have touched on it yourself. There was misinformation around some of the challenges that the current national parks have. Would it not be sensible to have an independent review of national parks? We know that they have annual reviews, but, effectively, the park authorities mark their own homework. Although the Government has oversight of that process, there is a lack of confidence that the reports reflect the true situation in national parks. There are still questions about whether parks deliver on their nature targets and for local communities.
Would you consider an independent review? If one had been in place prior to the Galloway national park proposal, the arguments would not have been quite so polarised and there would not have been accusations that misinformation led people to their conclusions about whether there should be a new park.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
There has been some concern about what the definition of cultural development is. Some have suggested that you should have considered alternative words such as “creative” or “creative arts”. Was there a reason, or much discussion around, why the term “cultural development” was used?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. You just rang a bell in my head. Why does the bill refer to the “prosperity of individuals”? That raised a few eyebrows among stakeholders. What is your definition of “prosperity of individuals”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Following on from Mark Ruskell’s question, I have one on the period for which these plans are in place and how often they are reviewed. Do you think that there is the potential for conflict? Local authorities have an electoral cycle and there are national plans such as the United Kingdom forestry standard, but we have a forestry industry that needs to plan 25, 30 or 35 years in advance. How can you ensure that the national park plans are flexible enough to deal with that?
Commercial forestry might not be a huge consideration in Sitka spruce scenarios and in the Cairngorms, but when the Government considers other areas—for example, the Galloway and Ayrshire national park—how can we be sure that the national park plans recognise the electoral cycles of local authorities and national plans such as the UK forestry standard? How can the park plans interact with those to ensure that they are flexible enough that they do not put off or divert investment away from local authorities when it comes to election and budget-setting scenarios?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
It appeared right from the outset that the timescales for the designation of the Galloway national park were going to be incredibly difficult to meet. The Galloway National Park Association had carried out the only work that had been done on the proposal and although that was very commendable, it was considered quite some time ago, before I became an MSP. It was clear quite early on that the Government’s consultation process was deeply flawed. Almost £350,000 was spent on that failed process. Should you not have considered halting the consultation earlier, given that it was so clear, even back in December and January at the turn of this year, that the process was ultimately doomed and would be very polarising?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Yes. Ultimately, the decision of the people in Galloway appeared to be based on the idea that national parks are not delivering and that they are actually curtailing the ability for areas to be economically sustainable. Again, the view was that national parks just exacerbate problems with the low-wage economy, low-skilled jobs, higher house prices and restrictions on agriculture. If that is not the case, why did that misinformation effectively succeed in persuading the majority of people in Galloway not to back a national park?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Good morning, and welcome to the 20th meeting of the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee in 2025. Before we begin, I ask everyone to ensure that electronic devices are switched to silent.
Our first item of business is consideration of whether to take item 4 in private. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
We have more or less come to the end of the questions on part 3 of the bill.
Additional amendments to part 3 may be lodged on the Galloway national park and the process for proposing and designating a new national park. At this stage, it is probably more appropriate to bring up those suggestions or concerns around the existing bill in our next evidence session, but it could also inform our discussions on our stage 1 report on the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill. I just wanted to put that on the record.
We come to the end of the evidence session. I propose that we suspend for 10 minutes.
09:42 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Certainly.