The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7545 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Okay. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
On that, the committee has previously, as part of our budget scrutiny, looked at the role of the marine directorate, and a concern was raised that the marine directorate did not appear to be focusing on exactly what you are talking about: growth, innovation and exploiting other fish stocks sustainably. For example, we have seen an increase in sea bass, and we know that the industry has benefited from an increasing quota for monkfish. There is a call for an octopus fishery in Shetland, and in my region there are on-going calls for work to be done to open up the cockle fisheries, which have, independently, been assessed as being worth between £3 million and £6 million to the local economy in Dumfries and Galloway.
There has been a delay with regard to fishing management plans, and I know that SFF is keen that the process is done right. However, given your call for that £360 million to be spent on fishing, do you think that the marine directorate is heading in the right direction? Does it have the right priorities to ensure that we can diversify our fishing industry and take advantage of other fish stocks?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
Much of the work on adapting to or mitigating that spatial squeeze will be down to the Scottish Government. Are you comfortable that the Scottish Government is aware of the potential impact over 12 years with regard to offshore cabling and whatever? Are you actively lobbying the Scottish Government about that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
We will come on to that shortly.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
If there are no other questions or comments on SPS, I intend to suspend for five minutes for a comfort break. When we resume we will move on to quota share and access agreements.
10:24 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
We will move on to questions that focus on quota shares and access agreements. What are your reactions to and main concerns about the extension to 2038 of the terms of the trade and co-operation agreement on access and quota shares? Some spokespeople have suggested that that was a complete capitulation. Perhaps Elspeth Macdonald can kick off.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
What are the practical knock-on effects of that? I come to you again, Elspeth, then I will bring in Jimmy Buchan. Given that the agreement will stand until 2038, what is the situation going to look like in our coastal communities and our processing sector?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
From your perspective, Jimmy, with reference to security and confidence on the processing side, is the agreement going to have an impact on your sector?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Finlay Carson
What role does the industry have in lobbying or working with the Scottish Government so that the Scottish Government makes the industry’s position clear on future trade agreements?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Finlay Carson
One issue that came out above the rest concerned the timescale for organisations to come forward in the bidding process and the capacity within areas to produce successful bids. There is no legislation at all for that, so we may need to look at addressing that by using the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill to make amendments to the existing National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000.
In some areas, there appeared to be an overreliance on using volunteers to bring forward proposals. We heard in evidence that it took up to seven years to reach a consensus about how the national parks in Loch Lomond and the Trossachs and in the Cairngorms would be developed and that businesses, locals, individuals and non-governmental organisations came together to look at how they would see a national park being developed. However, in Galloway, that timescale was significantly shorter.
The main issue was that NatureScot played two separate and distinct roles, one of which was to make recommendations as a reporter to the consultation while the other was as the natural heritage adviser to the Scottish Government. That led to a lot of people suggesting that NatureScot was biased in its role as reporter in providing the Scottish Government with professional advice as well as trying to carry out an effective consultation. How did you weigh up that advice, considering NatureScot’s two roles? Would you consider again an amendment that would provide for an independent reporter to provide the consultation responses for future designations?