The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7545 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
What are the thoughts behind no-purpose decrofting?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. We will move on to a question from Emma Roddick.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
I call Tim Eagle.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
I am sorry, Ariane, but we are moving off topic. I do not think that it is fair to ask the minister questions about the broader implications of avian flu.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
That concludes consideration of the instrument. I thank the minister and his officials for attending.
I suspend the meeting to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
09:31 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
We will move on to enforcement duties. I know that we have touched on them, but Alasdair Allan has a further question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Not animosity. Anonymity—that is the word. I am not going to try to say that again.
You know where I am coming from. In the past, there have been concerns that certain individuals have been targeted because of reporting breaches. Will there be that sort of fairness, if the commission is seen, ultimately, to be dealing with complaints instead of concerns about who made the complaint in the first place?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
The question is whether you think that naming complainants would be helpful. Some grazings committees have a limited number of members because of the way that the townships are made up, which makes individuals feel less comfortable about making a complaint. At the moment, the members of the grazings committees would be named. In your experience, is there a lower number of complaints because, to use the phrase again, there is no discretionary element?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Before we move on to the next questions, about common grazings, I would like you to set out exactly the issues with sub-tenants and short leases, whether they are formal or informal.
We have heard that a number of crofters sometimes use subletting or informal agreements to help—for example, when there is a crofter in their 70s who is no longer physically able to maintain or cultivate their croft and there is another crofter perhaps 40km away who uses the croft to graze their cattle or whatever. What are the issues there? A lot of the bill is about clearing things up, and you have suggested that it is a useful tool, but what is it trying to address? What are the issues with sublets and sub-tenants? Is it simply about absent crofters?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Finlay Carson
Is there an argument for toughening up the scenarios in which those shares can be decoupled from the crofting land? We have heard of people keeping the shares as an investment, because they see future value in them through a wind turbine being built on common grazings, for example. Alasdair Allan will ask about common grazings being used for environmental purposes—for peatland restoration, carbon credits, biodiversity credits and so on.
The whole philosophy behind, and the reason for having, crofting is not so that individuals gain wealth or capital, but the splitting of those shares away from the crofting land is potentially seen as an investment—it is almost land grabbing for a future increase in value. There are rules on shares, and people still have to abide by crofting rules, but do those rules need to be tightened? Do the deemed crofting rules need to be clearer, or will there be lots of court battles and judicial reviews in the future about none of the crofts that are attached to common grazing having the shares and all the shares being held somewhere else?