The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 7545 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Great. Thank you very much—and, again, apologies for missing you out of the introductions.
Donna, did you want to come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you. Our next theme is common grazings.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
I think that this is an appropriate point at which to jump to questions from the next member. Evelyn Tweed has some questions specifically about the topic that you just raised. I will come back to Ariane Burgess.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
I am sure that I am going to pre-empt what Alasdair Allan is about to say, but I note that the need to record who the person complaining was, at a grazing committee or whatever, previously caused issues. The bill will allow anyone to raise concerns.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
The commission’s reasoning behind its support of that was that some cases are more complex and would take more than 28 days, but I take your point that it cannot be a never-ending process.
Eilidh Ross, do you wish to come in?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
I look forward to reading the Official Report and getting my head around this. It is good to get that on the record, because we were uncertain what the specific issues were from the Law Society’s perspective.
10:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Crofting law is incredibly complex and there is a lot of history behind it. We have to understand that history to understand why we are at this point. I am a lowlander, and I am new to this, but let us suppose that a township has 50 crofters who all have 15 acres each. To make the croft viable, they have a share in a far larger area—5,000 acres of hill for grazing. The viability of that croft was absolutely linked to the grazing shares. However, that link has now been broken, whether deliberately or not. As Brian Inkster said earlier, is there not an argument that the physical croft should be tied in to those shares in order to continue as a viable unit, avoiding the risk of land banking or right banking where a 5,000-acre hill could potentially have wind turbines, peatland restoration or solar panels? The shares, which used to be worth very little, would then have a bankable value, or they could in the future. As Brian was saying, perhaps having legislation to pull things back together would have been the right approach, historically.
I will bring in Brian Inkster, as I have mentioned his name, and I will then bring in Stephen Cranston.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
We will move on to the crofting register, with questions from Emma Harper.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
Thank you very much for your contributions this morning. I will ask you to remain seated while the committee deals with our final agenda item, which should be very quick.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Finlay Carson
The Law Society of Scotland, in its submission, comments that any subsequent change to the list of uses for crofts should
“not prejudice those who have made long term commitments to particular uses prior to the removal of that purpose”.
How will that be an issue in practice?