The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6190 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
I will speak to my amendment 61 and other amendments in the group.
Amendment 61 would require the code of practice to be subject to parliamentary scrutiny under the affirmative procedure. Christine Grahame has proposed that, under the bill, the code of practice would not be subject to parliamentary scrutiny, but the delegated powers memorandum explains that she took that approach as the scope of the powers in sections 1 and 5 is
“narrowed by provisions set out on the face of the Bill”,
and any other matters that are included by the Scottish ministers would be informed by their consultation exercise.
The delegated powers memorandum concluded:
“The Member considers that the core content of code will stand the test of time and that it is therefore appropriate to include it in this way. ... the substantial elements of the code will have been scrutinised by the Parliament during the passage of the Bill”.
However, my amendment 61 would make the code subject to parliamentary scrutiny under the affirmative procedure.
In its stage 1 report, the Rural Affairs and Islands Committee referred to section 37 of the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006, stating that
“any animal welfare code ... must be laid before, and approved by resolution of, the Scottish Parliament before it can come into effect.”
The stage 1 report also referred to the stage 1 report that was produced by the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, in which it concluded that the code of practice “should be subject to” parliamentary scrutiny, due to “the evidential link” between compliance with the code and
“the possible commission of an offence”
under section 6 of the bill. The DPLR Committee recommended that
“the code of practice should be subject to a parliamentary procedure”
and set out the arguments for using either the affirmative or the negative procedure. The argument that the committee saw as being in favour of the affirmative procedure was
“the evidential link of a failure to follow the code of practice to the possible commissioning of an offence; and ... the power for Ministers to revise the code after consultation. This would align the code with codes of practice made under the 2006 Act.”
Once again, I ask members to support my amendment, which would mean that the code of practice would have to be scrutinised by Parliament under the affirmative procedure. That would more closely align with the 2006 act by giving ministers the power to revise the code after consultation and would address the evidential link between failure to follow the code of practice and the potential for an offence to be committed.
I call Rhoda Grant to speak to amendment 72 and other amendments in the group.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Our next item of business is an evidence session as part of our follow-up inquiry into salmon farming in Scotland. Today’s session is about marine spatial planning and consenting processes. We have around 90 minutes for the discussion. I welcome to the meeting Mark Harvey, who is from the planning team in Highland Council, and Ronan O’Hara, who is the chief executive of the Crown Estate Scotland. Rachel Shucksmith, who is the marine spatial planning manager at the University of the Highlands and Islands, joins us remotely.
I also welcome Edward Mountain MSP, who will be taking part in the discussion. Mr Mountain, do you have any interests to declare?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Dr Shucksmith, what do you believe are the current challenges around aquaculture planning and consenting, and what further improvements would help the current regime to address them?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
One of the REC Committee’s key recommendations was that there should be a more integrated and co-ordinated framework approach to consenting. One of the consenting task group’s solutions was to pilot a four-stage process. What is your experience of that? Is it working? What are your thoughts on the four-stage process?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
We move to our next theme, which is strategic spatial planning.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
I am sorry, but we have to move on. I am just very conscious of the time. We have about 30 minutes left and still have quite a number of questions to ask.
We move on to our third theme, which is siting near migratory routes, with a question from Emma Harper.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
The committee recently heard that there was evidence that sites are still being consented close to migratory routes, despite the policies in NPF4, and that district salmon fishery boards’ views are not given enough weight. Mark Harvey, given your experience, do you recognise those comments or concerns?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Thank you. We move to the next theme, which is enforcement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Amendment 60, in the name of Rachael Hamilton, is grouped with amendments 63, 65, 66, 71, 73, 74 and 77.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Finlay Carson
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 7, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 60 disagreed to.
Section 1—Ministers to make code of practice