The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6190 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Is there still a requirement to test for some residues? Does there need to be a review of that? There might have been an issue with some antibiotics, chemicals and pesticides in the past—I am thinking of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, or DDT, or other things for which there needed to be testing—but is there scope for reviewing what residues need to be tested for to ensure public safety? That might result in a reduction in costs.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
You touched on inshore fisheries, and we have had evidence from a number of stakeholders on them. Elspeth Macdonald, from the Scottish Fishermen’s Association, said that
“the directorate is spinning many, many plates and it looks to us as if the resource ... is being spread too thinly over too many things”,
and that
“We have many data gaps and poor information in relation to many of our inshore fisheries compared with some of the other fisheries.”
Similarly, Elaine Whyte, from the Clyde Fishermen’s Association, said:
“We feel that we have less contact with staff and that staff have more pressure on them. Going back 10 years ago, I would make a phone call to a member of staff to sort an issue, but that is far more difficult now.”
We know that previous budget documents have stated that an increase in marine directorate has been directed towards net zero, biodiversity and the expansion of offshore renewables. Is that the reason why we are hearing concerns relating to other fisheries policy areas? Has there been a negative impact on the delivery of fisheries policy objectives because of the focus on areas other than the fishing industry?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
We move on to fisheries science.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
That concerns the overall budget, but you state that the committee will
“be aware that the Bew review recommendations have not been fully implemented.”
I am not aware of that, and I am asking you which recommendations have not been implemented.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Another thing that raises questions relates to ring-fenced funding. The first table in your letter suggests that ring-fenced money and Bew review money are completely separate. Is the Bew review money not ring fenced? Is it not a conditional payment from the UK Treasury that is to be used for agriculture?
11:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
We move on to compliance and enforcement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Thank you, Ms Grahame.
We move to theme 5, which is collaboration and co-management, with a question from Ariane Burgess.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
Before we move on to overarching rural issues, we will pause for a comfort break.
10:46 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Finlay Carson
That is still a bit confusing. The Bew review was a process to identify whether the ring-fenced money was appropriate. It reflected on the nature of agriculture in Scotland, and it suggested that that money was not appropriate. We had an uplift of £25.7 million per year after that review. The ring-fenced money was not adequate but, as a result of the review, it has been increased by £25.7 million, very loosely—in general. My difficulty is that the cabinet secretary’s letter says that
“savings totalling £61.1 million were given up from within this ring-fenced budget.”
The budget is either ring fenced or not ring fenced—that is the difficulty. The £61.1 million does not relate to the £25.7 million. When is the Scottish Government allowed to dip into the ring-fenced budget that is allocated from the UK Treasury for agriculture?