The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1418 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning to youse. You might have heard some of the first panel’s responses to our questions. This is our first evidence session, so I will open it right up. What are your views on the proposed model of regulating non-surgical procedures, as set out in the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Emma Harper
What role do you think that Healthcare Improvement Scotland or other industry bodies have in setting up safety standards for practitioners who need to be trained, regulated and supported?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Emma Harper
What effect will the bill have on the reputation of the aesthetics industry?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Emma Harper
I will speak to my amendment 57. I believe that the cabinet secretary has always been clear that if the power in section 2(1) were used to make significant changes, the affirmative procedure should apply. I recognise that concerns were raised during the stage 1 debate about the lack of clarity on when the affirmative procedure would apply in respect of regulations made under section 2(1). My amendment has been developed with input from the cabinet secretary to ensure that it reflects the views that were expressed during the scrutiny of part 2 of the bill.
Sarah Boyack’s amendment 8 would introduce the affirmative procedure to cover the power that is provided in part 2 of the bill. However, such a blanket provision requiring the affirmative procedure would not be proportionate or an efficient use of public resources or the Parliament’s time.
I therefore seek support from the committee for my amendment 57, which strikes the right balance, as it would ensure that the affirmative procedure was used for substantive changes while allowing the negative procedure to be used only for clearly minor technical or administrative updates. That approach would maintain robust scrutiny where it was needed without creating unnecessary delays. My amendment reflects the most efficient use of the Parliament’s role in scrutinising legislation.
I therefore ask Sarah Boyack not to move amendment 8, and I ask members to support my amendment 57, which clarifies the procedure in sections 2, 6 and 7 of part 2 of the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Emma Harper
Thank you.
09:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning, minister. I have been listening to the conversation about bringing the industry, the farmers and everybody else along with us, so that we can achieve the ecological focus areas in a way that works for everybody.
Our briefing papers refer to the fact that the Soil Association, the Scottish Wildlife Trust and RSPB Scotland mentioned that discussions had taken place on extending the greening requirements to permanent grassland. Scotland’s Rural College offered a practical view. It suggested that a delay in EFA-type measures for permanent grassland
“would seem prudent ... enabling focused implementation of the new arable EFA requirements”.
The pace of change is such that permanent grassland has not been progressed as part of the enhanced greening. Is the Scottish Government planning to progress further measures for businesses that remain outwith the current scope of greening?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Emma Harper
There are a lot of big dairy farms in Dumfries and Galloway—48 per cent of Scotland’s dairy herd is in the south-west of Scotland. Those farms need grass for their dairy cattle. What work is being done to engage with the dairy sector to support it with the measures that it needs to take for EFAs?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Emma Harper
I appreciate the cabinet secretary giving way and describing this in a lot of detail. However, my whole intention was to implement a more proportionate approach. I appreciate the feedback on my amendment. Does she agree that the approach set out in my amendment would allow for more intensive scrutiny, if required?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Emma Harper
I have set my timer, convener, as I am conscious of the time.
I am aware that England has already introduced the measures and that Wales is about to. How do the regulations align with England, Wales and the EU? Are those regulations similar to what is being proposed in Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Emma Harper
Basically, product placement is part of it. How will we measure whether the regulations are working?