The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1282 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Emma Harper
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Emma Harper
You mentioned modest changes. We were at Cairngorms national park on Sunday and Monday, when we talked about the language used. Instead of saying,
“sustainable use of ... natural resources”,
the bill says,
“sustainable management and use of ... natural resources”.
What is the impact of adding that one word?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning. Nikki Sinclair, I will come to you first with this question. Part 3 of the bill proposes to broaden the purposes of national parks to include stronger emphasis on supporting biodiversity and nature recovery in addressing the climate crisis. Earlier, Dan Paris mentioned biodiversity targets in relation to national park strategies. What are your views on the changes to the statutory purposes of national parks in the bill, and what will the practical impact be of implementing those changes?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
I asked the previous witnesses about the requirement for a diagnosis of an addiction. I am interested to hear your thoughts on the advantages or disadvantages of the bill’s approach to requiring a diagnosis ahead of entering into all the different types of treatment that could be offered.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
Some people might not want to seek that diagnosis, then, or the stigma might prevent them from coming forward to access care or treatment because, although they know in themselves that they have a problem with alcohol or drugs, they do not want to hear it. Do we need to find some way of getting people into treatment without a diagnosis?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
To be clear, the protection of somebody’s anonymity is one thing that we need to be careful about with regard to the language around addiction. That is something that could be amended in the bill as it progresses.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
Before Lee Ball comes in, I need to remind everyone that I am a nurse and I have worked in recovery rooms and operating theatres with people who were harmed by drugs and alcohol.
While you are responding, Lee, can you say whether the language in the bill needs to change? What language would you suggest?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Emma Harper
Good morning, and thank you for being here.
The bill requires a relevant healthcare professional to diagnose individuals with a drug or alcohol-related problem and then to provide a treatment determination. What are your thoughts regarding the requirement for somebody to receive a diagnosis before they can enter into treatment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Emma Harper
I have had conversations outwith the committee about the challenges of space and the competition between building houses, pylons and wind turbines and planting trees. People complain to me a lot about battery storage, for instance. They ask, “Why are we putting in battery storage where we should be growing grass to feed cattle?”
Thinking about how the bill supports parliamentary scrutiny and stakeholder engagement, are there enough protections to make sure that we consider everything when it comes to environmental impact assessments? The bill is about supporting nature recovery and biodiversity, but all these other spatial asks are going on as well.