The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1988 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I have a question on something that I would like clarity about. After the chief constable’s initial statement in 2024, why did it take so long for a directive to be initiated and the policy to be implemented? Why was there that great long gap between then and now?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
What happens next? We are talking about the review and further evidence or advice being gathered. In answer to an earlier question, did you say that the human rights commission—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Is that organisation part of the oversight group, as you described it earlier?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
You said a number of times that Police Scotland has taken into account the report from Professor Alice Sullivan plus the Supreme Court decision. Is that not enough? Why do you have to wait for more bodies to give you advice?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
So, members and the public can be confident that—despite the delay in the implementation since the original statement was made in 2024—this is happening right across the board, right now?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Does the guidance that was talked about earlier relate to the two codes of conduct that will be published? Is the guidance subject to scrutiny by the oversight group and, if so, who belongs to the oversight group?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Will Police Scotland look retrospectively at all the data that was collected on the crime history system prior to 2018—I think that one of you gave that date—to ensure that all victims of rape and crime feel safe?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
My question is for Detective Superintendent Bertram. You spoke about having the powers to deal with trafficking, but we have heard that terrifying numbers of women are being enslaved, raped and financially controlled. My question is one that I asked previous witnesses: should the bill extend criminalisation to those who facilitate prostitution rather than criminalising only the buyers?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
Your written evidence says:
“There is a gap in the current legislation though with being able to police ‘off street’ CSE”—
which means child sexual exploitation—
“when there are no Human Trafficking indicators present.”
Is there any mechanism within the bill that would allow that gap to be filled?
Criminal Justice Committee Draft
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rachael Hamilton
I am sorry; I meant to say that. I am reading the acronym wrongly.