The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1957 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
I also want to ask about the suspension of a licence or suspension of any activities that could affect lives, livelihoods and perhaps investment. To suspend a licence, NatureScot has only to be satisfied that there is an issue. Notwithstanding all the conversations and explanations that the minister has given on the conversations between individuals, would an individual who has had a licence suspended or revoked have the ability to go into a cost recovery situation the other way round?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
We have heard in evidence that, if something that is regarded as a crime under conservation legislation is committed on a farm, the farmer is not required to stop working. The bill does not make that clear, which seems almost disproportionate, as we have heard. Would an appeal be weakened if NatureScot did not have to be satisfied that a relevant offence had been committed?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
I have had a look at the report, and I cannot see how its recommendations chime with what you are saying, particularly given the concerns about primacy of responsibility, access to intelligence, interference with other cases, and health and safety risks to personnel. We heard strong evidence from Detective Sergeant Lynn regarding concerns that, when an investigation progresses and police become involved, the measures could be a disadvantage, because things that the police would have done early in the investigation might not have been done. There is a huge amount of concern around your interpretation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
My question is on the proportionality of the licensing scheme. Last week, we heard from various witnesses that there should be a
“rational connection between the content and design of the scheme and its aim”
to tackle raptor persecution. It has been demonstrated that there is no rational connection between those aspects. Does the Government think that it is fair and proportionate to introduce a licensing scheme that does not have such a rational connection?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Are all of those related to grouse moors?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
How many are related to grouse moors?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
Do you agree that it is not proportionate to impose sanctions specifically against a certain sector, on the basis of suspicion, when no direct correlation exists?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
I think that you have just said yourself that it defines the clarity of the law, and that is very important—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 June 2023
Rachael Hamilton
You mentioned the law, and it does define the clarity of the law.