The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1932 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I have a comment, convener—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Okay.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
It is my main question, and it links to the point that Jen Ang made.
Do you believe that there would be unintended consequences of not having a medical diagnosis, in that, as some people have highlighted, that might shield a criminal and provide them with an invisible cloak when it comes to their past, removing safeguards for vulnerable women?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Thank you, convener. I have no interests to declare.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
That is quite timely. I think that I need a lie down. Susan Smith mentioned the Cass review, and it looks like there is a suggestion that some of today’s panel members would say, “Look at the Cass review and pause GRA reform here in Scotland.”
I have looked at the Cass review. It highlights the lack of routine and consistent data collection, which means that it is not possible to track outcomes for children and young people. Malcolm Clark specifically mentioned making sure that there is more therapeutic care and defining that service model, and—I suppose—the workforce implications.
I invite anyone to expand on that. You have all had your fair share of speaking, but who would like to kick off? Perhaps Susan Smith will, as she mentioned it.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I am horrified to learn that we are not conducting data collection so that we can give the best services to children and young people. If the reforms are accepted by Parliament, we are, as you say, putting the cart before the horse. How can workforce implications be taken into account and services be provided if we do not have the evidence and do not know how many people there are and what circumstances they are experiencing?
Convener, I am really shocked that the committee has not had the opportunity to get into the detail of that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
So do you believe that the process should be paused until we consider the Cass review, when that is published?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Does any other panel member have a view on that? Let me expand the question and ask what evidence you have seen, during this process, that a false declaration would be effective?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
If no one else wants to comment, that is fine.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I am not sure that that is a good comparison. A member of the previous panel mentioned the age at which you can get a tattoo. In addition, the census is not really providing the data that we need, because 10 per cent of the population have not managed to fill in the survey.