The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1957 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I will extend the question to the other witnesses. Let me ask Fraser Sutherland first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
It is strange how laws and regulations work. After all, you cannot get a credit card, place a bet, get a tattoo or drink alcohol until you are 18. The rules and regulations are strange for 16 to 18-year-olds.
Chris, can I bring you in here?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
My last point is that, with the Gender Recognition Act 2004, it already felt as though there had been an impact on the collection and use of the data, because public bodies are either refusing to collect or not collecting data based on sex. I am wondering whether the bill will exacerbate that problem. Do you agree that it could become a problem as we move forward?
It is a difficult question. On whether we bring the age down to 16, people’s views and experiences are based on certain points in their life, so, whether it is a job or things such as savings and pensions, there is a lot riding on this. Do you think that it is important, in light of our discussion, that data should be collected on a sex basis, perhaps as well as a gender basis, as you were talking about, so that we can create good policy?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I want to pick up on what Mr Kerr said regarding the allocation of prison accommodation. I would like clarity on how part 13 of the Prisons and Young Offenders Institutions (Scotland) Rules 2011 works with your policy. The rules state:
“Female prisoners must not share the same accommodation as male prisoners.”
Your current policy states that prison accommodation
“should reflect the gender in which the person in custody is currently living.”
Does that breach the 2011 rules? How do they work together?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Why is it that you have a different view from that of so many senior quantitative social scientists, who feel that it is very important to collect clear data on sex?
For example, we just spoke with a witness regarding the differences between England and Wales and Scotland. In the Scottish census, which you mentioned, the meanings of sex are different, so if NRS is then working with other bodies across England and Wales, how does that square?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
You referenced the census quite a lot, but only 86 per cent of people filled it in and there is concern that that data will not be able to be used in a quantitative manner. The census is a very difficult example to use in the current circumstances.
Everything is based on data. Criminal justice data, for example, is based on sex, not self-identification. I think that some people in public bodies would be concerned that there will be an impact. I do not really agree with what you said, because you started out by saying that you do use data. We use data here; we collected data and did a consultation, and 59 per cent of those who responded to that consultation disagreed with the principles of the bill. There are so many questions to be answered, such as how will the gender pay gap be measured? I am not sure that I feel reassured by your argument that we just need to base everything on self-identification.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Does people not saying that they have a GRC have an effect on the Scottish Prison Service? I know that we discussed the issue earlier, Mr Kerr, but I want to ask specifically about Kevin Guyan’s point that we do not really need to collect data on sex.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
Are you saying that controlling foxes to protect ground-nesting birds such as curlews and lapwings is not part of a long-term project in the way that stoat control would be?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
I, too, am confused about this. When it comes to people carrying out hare coursing on land without permission, would it not have been simpler to have kept the existing exclusion for rabbits but required landowner permission? Under the bill, if a hare courser was caught, would they be able to use that defence of hunting for something else?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 June 2022
Rachael Hamilton
What about sheep? How would you enclose them?